Institution profile

Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas

Academic institutionsouthamerica · ar
Official website
Research library50linked papers
Opportunities0open roles
Selected work

Representative Papers

Recovering Temporal and Geographic Signals from Language Model Embeddings

Sep 04, 2026

Understanding whether language-model embeddings encode structured real-world information is important for both representation analysis and information retrieval. We study this question for temporal and geographic signals using a simple projection-based method that operates directly on output embeddings. Given a small set of seed examples, the method defines an axis in embedding space and ranks texts or entities by their projection onto that axis. Our approach is fully black-box and model-agnostic: it requires only embeddings, without access to model weights, internal activations, auxiliary probes, or additional training. This makes it applicable to modern embedding models available only through APIs and provides a lightweight way to analyze whether temporal and spatial dimensions are present in their representation spaces. We apply the method to temporal and geographic datasets and find that embedding projections recover meaningful chronological and spatial structure. These results provide evidence that output embeddings encode signals relevant to time and space, while also offering a practical tool for interpretability and for downstream temporal and geographic information retrieval tasks, such as temporal ordering, geographic ranking, and tagging.

0 citationsRead paper

What Price Fairness? Evaluating Energy - Fairness - Accuracy Trade-off in Recommender Systems

Sep 04, 2026

Fairness-aware recommender systems aim to mitigate systematic imbalances in recommendation outcomes, including how visibility, relevance, and opportunities are distributed among users, items, and providers. However, these systems are usually evaluated in terms of accuracy and fairness alone, while their computational and environmental costs remain largely invisible. This omission matters because fairness interventions may affect the cost of recommendation in different ways. Training-time methods modify model optimization, post-processing methods add computation at inference time, and both may depend on the model, dataset, hardware, and deployment setting. We examine whether provider-side fairness in recommendation comes with a measurable green cost. We compare in-processing, graph-level reweighting and post-processing interventions across multiple models, two datasets, and two hardware settings. We measure recommendation quality, provider-side exposure, and energy consumption separately across training and inference stages. Our results show that the green cost of fairness is not uniform, post-processing shifts cost to repeated serving, while in-processing and graph-level methods avoid re-ranking overhead but vary substantially across models, datasets, and hardware. Findings call for evaluating fairness-aware recommendation as a three-way trade-off between accuracy, fairness, and computational cost.

0 citationsRead paper
Recent publications

Latest Papers

Recovering Temporal and Geographic Signals from Language Model Embeddings

Sep 04, 2026

Understanding whether language-model embeddings encode structured real-world information is important for both representation analysis and information retrieval. We study this question for temporal and geographic signals using a simple projection-based method that operates directly on output embeddings. Given a small set of seed examples, the method defines an axis in embedding space and ranks texts or entities by their projection onto that axis. Our approach is fully black-box and model-agnostic: it requires only embeddings, without access to model weights, internal activations, auxiliary probes, or additional training. This makes it applicable to modern embedding models available only through APIs and provides a lightweight way to analyze whether temporal and spatial dimensions are present in their representation spaces. We apply the method to temporal and geographic datasets and find that embedding projections recover meaningful chronological and spatial structure. These results provide evidence that output embeddings encode signals relevant to time and space, while also offering a practical tool for interpretability and for downstream temporal and geographic information retrieval tasks, such as temporal ordering, geographic ranking, and tagging.

0 citationsRead paper

What Price Fairness? Evaluating Energy - Fairness - Accuracy Trade-off in Recommender Systems

Sep 04, 2026

Fairness-aware recommender systems aim to mitigate systematic imbalances in recommendation outcomes, including how visibility, relevance, and opportunities are distributed among users, items, and providers. However, these systems are usually evaluated in terms of accuracy and fairness alone, while their computational and environmental costs remain largely invisible. This omission matters because fairness interventions may affect the cost of recommendation in different ways. Training-time methods modify model optimization, post-processing methods add computation at inference time, and both may depend on the model, dataset, hardware, and deployment setting. We examine whether provider-side fairness in recommendation comes with a measurable green cost. We compare in-processing, graph-level reweighting and post-processing interventions across multiple models, two datasets, and two hardware settings. We measure recommendation quality, provider-side exposure, and energy consumption separately across training and inference stages. Our results show that the green cost of fairness is not uniform, post-processing shifts cost to repeated serving, while in-processing and graph-level methods avoid re-ranking overhead but vary substantially across models, datasets, and hardware. Findings call for evaluating fairness-aware recommendation as a three-way trade-off between accuracy, fairness, and computational cost.

0 citationsRead paper