Institution profile

Montclair State University

Academic institutionnorthamerica · us
Official website
Research library22linked papers
Opportunities0open roles
Selected work

Representative Papers

A Social Welfare Function Satisfying Anonymity and Almost Weak Pareto

Oct 04, 2026

This study addresses whether social welfare functions (SWFs) over infinite utility streams can simultaneously satisfy anonymity and the approximate weak Pareto property. By integrating order isomorphism theory, set-theoretic analysis, and an axiomatic social choice framework, it precisely characterizes the one-period utility domains that permit the existence of such SWFs. The central contribution demonstrates that the existence conditions for SWFs under the approximate weak Pareto constraint coincide exactly with those in the classical weak Pareto setting. Building on this equivalence, the authors construct SWFs that are both invariant and stationary. Ultimately, this work establishes sharp boundaries for the existence of SWFs, providing a rigorous theoretical foundation for economic decision-making over infinite time horizons.

0 citationsRead paper

Reddit Community Interventions and Cross-Platform Response: Migration and Policy-Response Discourse on Voat

Sep 04, 2026

Platform moderation can disrupt online communities, but the responses that follow do not necessarily take the form of direct migration. Communities may relocate, reorganize, discuss moderation decisions, express censorship concerns, or continue activity on alternative platforms without clear evidence of user-level movement. This study examines Reddit community bans and quarantines and their relationship with activity and migration-related discourse on Voat. Using data from the Multi-Platform Aggregated Dataset of Online Communities (MADOC), we analyze interventions affecting FatPeopleHate, GreatAwakening, MillionDollarExtreme, and CringeAnarchy. We combine computational discourse screening with a stratified independent human-validation procedure and population-adjusted estimates across 90-day pre- and post-intervention windows. The results reveal heterogeneous cross-platform responses. FatPeopleHate experienced a substantial increase in overall Voat activity while the relative prevalence of policy-response and broader relevant discourse declined. CringeAnarchy showed declines in direct migration and policy-response discourse following its permanent ban, although some estimates were sensitive to uncertain human labels. GreatAwakening instead exhibited a modest increase in policy-response discourse without clear evidence of increased direct migration. These findings suggest that platform interventions do not produce a uniform migration process. Overall destination-platform activity and migration-related discourse may move in different directions, highlighting the importance of distinguishing behavioral migration from broader discussion of moderation, censorship, governance, and community rebuilding.

0 citationsRead paper
Recent publications

Latest Papers

A Social Welfare Function Satisfying Anonymity and Almost Weak Pareto

Oct 04, 2026

This study addresses whether social welfare functions (SWFs) over infinite utility streams can simultaneously satisfy anonymity and the approximate weak Pareto property. By integrating order isomorphism theory, set-theoretic analysis, and an axiomatic social choice framework, it precisely characterizes the one-period utility domains that permit the existence of such SWFs. The central contribution demonstrates that the existence conditions for SWFs under the approximate weak Pareto constraint coincide exactly with those in the classical weak Pareto setting. Building on this equivalence, the authors construct SWFs that are both invariant and stationary. Ultimately, this work establishes sharp boundaries for the existence of SWFs, providing a rigorous theoretical foundation for economic decision-making over infinite time horizons.

0 citationsRead paper

Reddit Community Interventions and Cross-Platform Response: Migration and Policy-Response Discourse on Voat

Sep 04, 2026

Platform moderation can disrupt online communities, but the responses that follow do not necessarily take the form of direct migration. Communities may relocate, reorganize, discuss moderation decisions, express censorship concerns, or continue activity on alternative platforms without clear evidence of user-level movement. This study examines Reddit community bans and quarantines and their relationship with activity and migration-related discourse on Voat. Using data from the Multi-Platform Aggregated Dataset of Online Communities (MADOC), we analyze interventions affecting FatPeopleHate, GreatAwakening, MillionDollarExtreme, and CringeAnarchy. We combine computational discourse screening with a stratified independent human-validation procedure and population-adjusted estimates across 90-day pre- and post-intervention windows. The results reveal heterogeneous cross-platform responses. FatPeopleHate experienced a substantial increase in overall Voat activity while the relative prevalence of policy-response and broader relevant discourse declined. CringeAnarchy showed declines in direct migration and policy-response discourse following its permanent ban, although some estimates were sensitive to uncertain human labels. GreatAwakening instead exhibited a modest increase in policy-response discourse without clear evidence of increased direct migration. These findings suggest that platform interventions do not produce a uniform migration process. Overall destination-platform activity and migration-related discourse may move in different directions, highlighting the importance of distinguishing behavioral migration from broader discussion of moderation, censorship, governance, and community rebuilding.

0 citationsRead paper