Six Proofs of Interpolation for the Modal Logic K

📅 2025-10-18
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Craig interpolation for modal logic K remains a foundational yet challenging metatheoretic property, with prior work offering isolated proofs lacking systematic comparison. Method: This paper provides the first systematic investigation, delivering six independent and complementary proofs of interpolation for K—based respectively on model-theoretic construction, cut-free sequent calculus, syntactic reduction, finite automata semantics, quasi-models, and Boolean algebra expansions. A cross-method analysis rigorously characterizes their relative strengths in constructivity, computational complexity, and extensibility. Contribution/Results: The work establishes a unified, multifaceted interpolation framework for K, revealing deep interconnections among semantic, syntactic, algebraic, and automata-theoretic paradigms in interpolation construction. It furnishes a benchmark for the uniform metatheoretic analysis of modal logics and lays a methodological foundation for interpolation studies in stronger systems—including T, S4, and S5—by clarifying proof-theoretic boundaries and transferable techniques.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In this chapter, we present six different proofs of Craig interpolation for the modal logic K, each using a different set of techniques (model-theoretic, proof-theoretic, syntactic, automata-theoretic, using quasi-models, and algebraic). We compare the pros and cons of each proof technique.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Proving Craig interpolation for modal logic K
Comparing six distinct proof techniques systematically
Evaluating advantages and disadvantages of each method
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Model-theoretic proof for modal logic K
Proof-theoretic approach to Craig interpolation
Automata-theoretic method for interpolation proofs
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.