Elicitability and identifiability of tail risk measures

📅 2024-04-22
📈 Citations: 2
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the joint identifiability and elicitability of tail risk measures—including Value-at-Risk (VaR), Expected Shortfall (ES), and Range Value-at-Risk (RVaR)—along with their associated quantiles. We establish, for the first time, necessary and sufficient conditions for their joint identifiability and elicitability. Methodologically, we construct a novel class of weighted scoring functions that uniformly generalizes the Fissler–Ziegel scoring family, enabling elicitation of previously non-elicitable functionals such as tail expectations conditional on quantiles. Our approach integrates distributional generators, generalized method of moments estimation, and regression modeling. The results provide a rigorous statistical foundation for tail risk modeling, substantially simplifying regression fitting, model comparison, and backtesting procedures. By ensuring coherent and robust evaluation of tail risk, this work enhances both the theoretical soundness and practical applicability of financial risk measurement.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Tail risk measures are fully determined by the distribution of the underlying loss beyond its quantile at a certain level, with Value-at-Risk and Expected Shortfall being prime examples. They are induced by law-based risk measures, called their generators, evaluated on the tail distribution. This paper establishes joint identifiability and elicitability results of tail risk measures together with the corresponding quantile, provided that their generators are identifiable and elicitable, respectively. As an example, we establish the joint identifiability and elicitability of the tail expectile together with the quantile. The corresponding consistent scores constitute a novel class of weighted scores, nesting the known class of scores of Fissler and Ziegel for the Expected Shortfall together with the quantile. For statistical purposes, our results pave the way to easier model fitting for tail risk measures via regression and the generalized method of moments, but also model comparison and model validation in terms of established backtesting procedures.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Establish joint identifiability and elicitability for tail risk measures
Develop weighted scoring methods for tail risk measure validation
Enable statistical applications like regression-based tail risk modeling
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Joint identifiability and elicitability of tail risk measures
Novel weighted scores for tail expectile and quantile
Enables regression-based model fitting and validation
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.