Annotating the Chain-of-Thought: A Behavior-Labeled Dataset for AI Safety

πŸ“… 2025-10-20
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF

career value

191K/year
πŸ€– AI Summary
Existing text-based safety analysis methods for reasoning often overlook subtle harmful patterns and fail to capture latent unsafe reasoning paths within large language models (LLMs). To address this, we introduce the first sentence-level fine-grained annotated dataset of reasoning-chain safety behaviors, enabling precise temporal localization of safe or harmful behavior during LLM generation. Methodologically, we integrate sentence-level behavioral annotation, layer-wise activation vector extraction, and steering vectors to achieve the first detectable and intervenable representational modeling of safety behavior within reasoning chains. Experiments demonstrate that the learned representations effectively identify and modulate internal safety-related activations, significantly improving the accuracy and controllability of safety monitoring during inference. Our results validate the effectiveness and feasibility of activation-state-based, fine-grained safety supervision as a novel paradigm for reasoning safety.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Recent work has highlighted the importance of monitoring chain-of-thought reasoning for AI safety; however, current approaches that analyze textual reasoning steps can miss subtle harmful patterns and may be circumvented by models that hide unsafe reasoning. We present a sentence-level labeled dataset that enables activation-based monitoring of safety behaviors during LLM reasoning. Our dataset contains reasoning sequences with sentence-level annotations of safety behaviors such as expression of safety concerns or speculation on user intent, which we use to extract steering vectors for detecting and influencing these behaviors within model activations. The dataset fills a key gap in safety research: while existing datasets label reasoning holistically, effective application of steering vectors for safety monitoring could be improved by identifying precisely when specific behaviors occur within reasoning chains. We demonstrate the dataset's utility by extracting representations that both detect and steer safety behaviors in model activations, showcasing the potential of activation-level techniques for improving safety oversight on reasoning. Content Warning: This paper discusses AI safety in the context of harmful prompts and may contain references to potentially harmful content.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Detecting subtle harmful patterns in chain-of-thought reasoning
Monitoring safety behaviors through model activation analysis
Identifying specific unsafe reasoning steps within AI processes
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Dataset enables activation-based safety behavior monitoring
Sentence-level annotations extract steering vectors for detection
Activation-level techniques detect and steer safety behaviors