🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the limitation of first-order flow matching in robot motion planning—its inability to explicitly model acceleration, leading to trajectory jitter and dynamic infeasibility. We propose the first second-order flow matching framework that explicitly incorporates full trajectory dynamics (position, velocity, and acceleration) into a conditional flow matching formulation. By introducing a continuous-time, second-order differential motion representation, we establish a deterministic, noise-free, acceleration-aware flow learning paradigm—moving beyond conventional velocity-field-only modeling. The method preserves computational efficiency while significantly improving trajectory smoothness, physical feasibility, and task success rates, outperforming diffusion-based models and state-of-the-art planners on standard motion planning benchmarks. Our core contribution is the principled integration of second-order dynamics into flow matching, enabling more robust and physically realistic robot motion generation.
📝 Abstract
Prior flow matching methods in robotics have primarily learned velocity fields to morph one distribution of trajectories into another. In this work, we extend flow matching to capture second-order trajectory dynamics, incorporating acceleration effects either explicitly in the model or implicitly through the learning objective. Unlike diffusion models, which rely on a noisy forward process and iterative denoising steps, flow matching trains a continuous transformation (flow) that directly maps a simple prior distribution to the target trajectory distribution without any denoising procedure. By modeling trajectories with second-order dynamics, our approach ensures that generated robot motions are smooth and physically executable, avoiding the jerky or dynamically infeasible trajectories that first-order models might produce. We empirically demonstrate that this second-order conditional flow matching yields superior performance on motion planning benchmarks, achieving smoother trajectories and higher success rates than baseline planners. These findings highlight the advantage of learning acceleration-aware motion fields, as our method outperforms existing motion planning methods in terms of trajectory quality and planning success.