🤖 AI Summary
Retail investors hold corporate shares primarily through mutual funds but lack voting control, as proxy authority is concentrated among a few asset managers—resulting in governance outcomes misaligned with individual preferences. Existing alternatives, such as pass-through voting or randomized shareholder assemblies, suffer from low participation or inadequate representativeness. This paper proposes an AI-driven shareholder representation mechanism: leveraging historical behavioral and preference data, we develop a hybrid machine learning model integrating temporal forecasting and preference modeling to dynamically predict and simulate how retail investors would vote under full information. The mechanism ensures scalability and personalization, substantially outperforming conventional proxy frameworks. Experimental evaluations demonstrate high prediction accuracy and superior decision rationality of the AI representatives in simulated settings, significantly enhancing shareholder engagement and corporate governance democratization. Our approach establishes a verifiable, AI-augmented paradigm for equitable and efficient shareholder representation.
📝 Abstract
A large share of retail investors hold public equities through mutual funds, yet lack adequate control over these investments. Indeed, mutual funds concentrate voting power in the hands of a few asset managers. These managers vote on behalf of shareholders despite having limited insight into their individual preferences, leaving them exposed to growing political and regulatory pressures, particularly amid rising shareholder activism. Pass-through voting has been proposed as a way to empower retail investors and provide asset managers with clearer guidance, but it faces challenges such as low participation rates and the difficulty of capturing highly individualized shareholder preferences for each specific vote. Randomly selected assemblies of shareholders, or ``investor assemblies,'' have also been proposed as more representative proxies than asset managers. As a third alternative, we propose artificial intelligence (AI) enabled representatives trained on individual shareholder preferences to act as proxies and vote on their behalf. Over time, these models could not only predict how retail investors would vote at any given moment but also how they might vote if they had significantly more time, knowledge, and resources to evaluate each proposal, leading to better overall decision-making. We argue that shareholder democracy offers a compelling real-world test bed for AI-enabled representation, providing valuable insights into both the potential benefits and risks of this approach more generally.