🤖 AI Summary
While cognitive science and AI have developed disparate formal models for distinct reasoning types—such as classification, induction, abduction, and causal reasoning—no unified formal framework exists to integrate them. Method: This paper proposes a materialist modeling approach grounded in logic gate circuits, mapping diverse reasoning patterns onto combinational digital circuits to explicitly represent their shared functional dependency structures within a symbolic system. We identify four fundamental dependency relations and eight canonical reasoning patterns, synthesizing insights from symbolic AI, probabilistic semantics of logic programs, and combinatorial logic analysis. Contribution/Results: The resulting framework constitutes the first unified formal model encompassing multiple reasoning modalities. It uncovers latent functional organization within logic programs and provides a structured, interpretable foundation for cross-mechanism cognitive modeling and explainable AI.
📝 Abstract
Cognitive studies and artificial intelligence have developed distinct models for various inferential mechanisms (categorization, induction, abduction, causal inference, contrast, merge, ...). Yet, both natural and artificial views on cognition lack apparently a unifying framework. This paper formulates a speculative answer attempting to respond to this gap. To postulate on higher-level activation processes from a material perspective, we consider inferential mechanisms informed by symbolic AI modelling techniques, through the simplistic lenses of electronic circuits based on logic gates. We observe that a logic gate view entails a different treatment of implication and negation compared to standard logic and logic programming. Then, by combinatorial exploration, we identify four main forms of dependencies that can be realized by these inferential circuits. Looking at how these forms are generally used in the context of logic programs, we identify eight common inferential patterns, exposing traditionally distinct inferential mechanisms in an unifying framework. Finally, following a probabilistic interpretation of logic programs, we unveil inner functional dependencies. The paper concludes elaborating in what sense, even if our arguments are mostly informed by symbolic means and digital systems infrastructures, our observations may pinpoint to more generally applicable structures.