What Can Be Recovered Under Sparse Adversarial Corruption? Assumption-Free Theory for Linear Measurements

πŸ“… 2025-10-28
πŸ“ˆ Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
πŸ“„ PDF
πŸ€– AI Summary
This work addresses the recoverability of an unknown ground-truth signal $x^*$ from linear observations $y = Ax^* + e$ corrupted by sparse adversarial noise $e$ with unknown support but known sparsity level $q$. Specifically, it asks: given only $q$, what is the minimal consistent recovery setβ€”the smallest set containing $x^*$ that carries maximal informative structure? Prior approaches rely on strong structural assumptions (e.g., RIP or signal sparsity), whereas this paper provides, for the first time, an exact characterization valid for *any* sensing matrix $A$: the minimal consistent recovery set is $x^* + ker(U)$, where $U$ is the restriction of $A$ to the intersection of its row space and a particular projection subspace. This reveals that the kernel structure of $U$ fundamentally governs recovery limits. Moreover, all $ell_0$-minimizing solutions necessarily lie within this set. The result establishes a unified, assumption-free recovery theory and yields a computationally tractable recovery framework.

Technology Category

Application Category

πŸ“ Abstract
Let (m{A} in mathbb{R}^{m imes n}) be an arbitrary, known matrix and (m{e}) a (q)-sparse adversarial vector. Given (m{y} = m{A} x^* + m{e}) and (q), we seek the smallest set containing (x^*)-hence the one conveying maximal information about (x^*)-that is uniformly recoverable from (m{y}) without knowing (m{e}). While exact recovery of (x^*) via strong (and often impractical) structural assumptions on (m{A}) or (x^*) (for example, restricted isometry, sparsity) is well studied, recoverability for arbitrary (m{A}) and (x^*) remains open. Our main result shows that the best that one can hope to recover is (x^* + ker(m{U})), where (m{U}) is the unique projection matrix onto the intersection of rowspaces of all possible submatrices of (m{A}) obtained by deleting (2q) rows. Moreover, we prove that every (x) that minimizes the (ell_0)-norm of (m{y} - m{A} x) lies in (x^* + ker(m{U})), which then gives a constructive approach to recover this set.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Recovering signal from sparse adversarial corruption
Finding minimal recoverable set without structural assumptions
Characterizing recoverable set via kernel of projection matrix
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Recovers signal plus kernel of projection matrix
Minimizes L0-norm of measurement residuals
Uses rowspace intersection of all submatrices
πŸ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
V
Vishal Halder
IMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, UMR CNRS 6285, Brest, France
Alexandre Reiffers-Masson
Alexandre Reiffers-Masson
Associate Prof, IMT Atlantique
Game theoryStochastic ProcessLearningOptimizationNetworks
A
Abdeldjalil AΓ―ssa-El-Bey
IMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, UMR CNRS 6285, Brest, France
G
Gugan Thoppe
Indian Institute of Science, Computer Science and Automation, Bengaluru, India