Semi-supervised and unsupervised learning for health indicator extraction from guided waves in aerospace composite structures

📅 2025-10-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Extracting reliable health indicators (HIs) from guided-wave signals for aerospace composite structures remains challenging due to material variability, stochastic damage evolution, multimodal wave propagation, and—critically—the absence of ground-truth degradation labels. Method: This paper proposes a novel HI construction framework integrating semi-supervised and unsupervised learning. It introduces the Diversity-DeepSAD model, which leverages continuous auxiliary labels to characterize intermediate degradation states, and the monotonicity-constrained DTC-VAE model, designed to generate physically interpretable, trend-consistent HIs. The method fuses time-, frequency-, and time–frequency-domain features from multi-frequency guided waves, incorporating FFT and unsupervised ensemble learning. Contribution/Results: Experimental results demonstrate that DTC-VAE yields the most consistent HIs, achieving 92.3% accuracy while significantly reducing frequency dependency and variance—thereby enhancing robustness in structural health monitoring.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Health indicators (HIs) are central to diagnosing and prognosing the condition of aerospace composite structures, enabling efficient maintenance and operational safety. However, extracting reliable HIs remains challenging due to variability in material properties, stochastic damage evolution, and diverse damage modes. Manufacturing defects (e.g., disbonds) and in-service incidents (e.g., bird strikes) further complicate this process. This study presents a comprehensive data-driven framework that learns HIs via two learning approaches integrated with multi-domain signal processing. Because ground-truth HIs are unavailable, a semi-supervised and an unsupervised approach are proposed: (i) a diversity deep semi-supervised anomaly detection (Diversity-DeepSAD) approach augmented with continuous auxiliary labels used as hypothetical damage proxies, which overcomes the limitation of prior binary labels that only distinguish healthy and failed states while neglecting intermediate degradation, and (ii) a degradation-trend-constrained variational autoencoder (DTC-VAE), in which the monotonicity criterion is embedded via an explicit trend constraint. Guided waves with multiple excitation frequencies are used to monitor single-stiffener composite structures under fatigue loading. Time, frequency, and time-frequency representations are explored, and per-frequency HIs are fused via unsupervised ensemble learning to mitigate frequency dependence and reduce variance. Using fast Fourier transform features, the augmented Diversity-DeepSAD model achieved 81.6% performance, while DTC-VAE delivered the most consistent HIs with 92.3% performance, outperforming existing baselines.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Extracting reliable health indicators from guided waves in aerospace composites
Overcoming limitations of binary labels in damage state classification
Addressing variability in material properties and damage evolution modes
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Diversity-DeepSAD uses continuous damage proxy labels
DTC-VAE embeds monotonicity via trend constraints
Unsupervised ensemble learning fuses multi-frequency health indicators
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
J
James Josep Perry
Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence for Structures, Prognostics & Health Management, Aerospace Engineering Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, Delft, 2629 HS, the Netherlands
P
Pablo Garcia-Conde Ortiz
Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence for Structures, Prognostics & Health Management, Aerospace Engineering Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, Delft, 2629 HS, the Netherlands
G
George Konstantinou
Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence for Structures, Prognostics & Health Management, Aerospace Engineering Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, Delft, 2629 HS, the Netherlands
C
Cornelie Vergouwen
Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence for Structures, Prognostics & Health Management, Aerospace Engineering Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, Delft, 2629 HS, the Netherlands
E
Edlyn Santha Kumaran
Center of Excellence in Artificial Intelligence for Structures, Prognostics & Health Management, Aerospace Engineering Faculty, Delft University of Technology, Kluyverweg 1, Delft, 2629 HS, the Netherlands
Morteza Moradi
Morteza Moradi
Postdoctoral Researcher, Aerospace Engineering Faculty, Delft University of Technology
Information FusionAISignal ProcessingIntelligent StructuresPrognostics and Health Management