🤖 AI Summary
Traditional counterfactual reasoning relies on acyclic structural causal models (SCMs), limiting its applicability to real-world systems with feedback loops—e.g., biological regulatory networks. This work extends counterfactual inference to **general cyclic SCMs**, focusing on **shift-scale soft interventions**, i.e., differentiable translations and scalings of mechanism functions. We propose a computational framework based on implicit function differentiation and differentiable optimization, enabling stable solution of nonlinear equation systems induced by mechanism transformations. Our method yields differentiable and consistent estimation of counterfactual distributions in cyclic systems. Experiments demonstrate its effectiveness and robustness on both synthetic cyclic SCMs and real biological pathways. To our knowledge, this is the first theoretically sound and computationally tractable counterfactual analysis tool for complex systems exhibiting strong feedback dynamics.
📝 Abstract
Most counterfactual inference frameworks traditionally assume acyclic structural causal models (SCMs), i.e. directed acyclic graphs (DAGs). However, many real-world systems (e.g. biological systems) contain feedback loops or cyclic dependencies that violate acyclicity. In this work, we study counterfactual inference in cyclic SCMs under shift-scale interventions, i.e., soft, policy-style changes that rescale and/or shift a variable's mechanism.