Practical HPCQC Integration with QDMI: A Real-Hardware Case Study with IQM Systems

📅 2026-04-21
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

200K/year
🤖 AI Summary
Integrating quantum computers into high-performance computing (HPC) centers is often hindered by reliance on vendor-specific adapters, impeding production-level deployment. This work proposes and implements a standardized hardware-software boundary based on the Quantum Device Management Interface (QDMI), using an IQM superconducting quantum system as a case study to seamlessly integrate with the Slurm job scheduler and Qiskit user workflows. The implementation demonstrates that QDMI provides a unified interface for coordinating HPC resources and quantum hardware across different vendors and deployment models, thereby eliminating redundant custom development. The authors have open-sourced their QDMI-on-IQM integration, significantly simplifying the deployment of quantum-HPC hybrid systems in today’s heterogeneous computing environments.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Quantum computers are moving into HPC centers, and the main challenge is now integration rather than pure hardware access. Many current software paths still depend on vendor-specific adapter chains between user SDKs, schedulers, and backend APIs. This pattern makes operations more complex than necessary and slows the transition from pilots to production workflows. We present a practical integration path centered on the Quantum Device Management Interface (QDMI). Using IQM superconducting systems as a hardware case study, we implement an IQM-backed QDMI layer and connect it to two software layers that HPC centers working with quantum computers already care about: Slurm-based job execution and Qiskit-facing user workflows. The implementation is publicly available at https://github.com/iqm-finland/QDMI-on-IQM. The key message is simple: integrating quantum hardware into HPC does not have to be a bespoke engineering effort for each backend. Once the software-hardware boundary is standardized, large parts of the stack become reusable across providers and deployment styles. Our results do not claim that standardization eliminates all HPCQC challenges. They show that this specific boundary can already be standardized today in a way that is practical for users, operators, and vendors.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

HPCQC
quantum computing integration
QDMI
vendor-specific adapters
HPC centers
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

QDMI
HPCQC
quantum hardware integration
standardization
Slurm-Qiskit interoperability
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
L
Lukas Burgholzer
Munich Quantum Software Company GmbH, Garching near Munich, Germany; Chair for Design Automation, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
M
Marcel Walter
Munich Quantum Software Company GmbH, Garching near Munich, Germany; Chair for Design Automation, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
P
Patrick Hopf
Munich Quantum Software Company GmbH, Garching near Munich, Germany; Chair for Design Automation, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
Á
Álvaro Caride-Tabarés Sánchez
IQM Quantum Computers, Espoo, Finland
T
Teemu Mattsson
IQM Quantum Computers, Espoo, Finland
B
Bernd Hoffmann
IQM Quantum Computers, Espoo, Finland
N
Noora Färkkilä
IQM Quantum Computers, Espoo, Finland
D
Daniel Bulmash
IQM Quantum Computers, Espoo, Finland
Robert Wille
Robert Wille
Technical University of Munich and SCCH GmbH
design automationquantum computingmicrofluidicssimulationverification
E
Eric Mansfield
IQM Quantum Computers, Espoo, Finland