🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses a critical gap in crisis informatics concerning the long-term recovery phase, examining how climate gentrification—driven by climate change—and housing inequality are continuously negotiated across online (neighborhood Facebook groups) and offline (municipal meetings) public spheres. Focusing on eight months of community discourse in a New York City neighborhood post-Hurricane Ida, we employ a mixed-methods approach: LDA topic modeling, critical discourse analysis, participatory observation, and structured coding. Results reveal high thematic convergence across platforms—including housing safety, governmental trust, and resource allocation—confirming their function as complementary public spheres. This work constitutes the first systematic demonstration of cross-platform discursive co-evolution under chronic crisis conditions. It advances novel frameworks for cross-platform participatory design and resilience-oriented governance, thereby shifting crisis informatics from emergency response toward long-term structural equity.
📝 Abstract
Recovering from crises, such as hurricanes or wildfires, is a complex process that can take weeks, months, or even decades to overcome. Crises have both acute (immediate) and chronic (long-term) effects on communities. Crisis informatics research often focuses on the immediate response phase of disasters, thereby overlooking the long-term recovery phase, which is critical for understanding the information needs of users undergoing challenges like climate gentrification and housing inequity. We fill this gap by investigating community discourse over eight months following Hurricane Ida in an online neighborhood Facebook group and Town Hall Meetings of a borough in the New York Metropolitan region. Using a mixed methods approach, we examined the use of social media to manage long-term disaster recovery. The findings revealed a significant overlap in topics, underscoring the interconnected nature of online and offline community discourse, and illuminated themes related to the long-term consequences of disasters. We conclude with recommendations aimed at helping designers and government leaders enhance participation across community forums and support recovery in the aftermath of disasters.