🤖 AI Summary
Coordinate-exchange algorithms are widely employed to generate optimal experimental designs; however, the ordering of design points in their output exhibits an overlooked systematic bias, leading to significantly elevated frequencies of certain permutations and potentially compromising the statistical validity of experiments. This study is the first to uncover this non-randomness through order-statistic analysis, integrating principles from experimental design theory with algorithmic behavior research to demonstrate that the outputs of coordinate-exchange algorithms are not truly random. The findings underscore the necessity of introducing an explicit randomization step following the application of such algorithms and provide both theoretical justification and practical recommendations for enhancing the reliability of experimental designs.
📝 Abstract
The coordinate-exchange algorithm is commonly used to construct optimal experimental designs. Every execution of the coordinate-exchange algorithm produces a new, seemingly random, order of the selected design points. In this short communication, we study the order of the design points produced by the algorithm and conclude that certain orders appear much more often than others. As a result, an explicit randomization step of the design points is required before conducting an experiment using a design produced by a coordinate-exchange algorithm.