Identifiability and amortized inference limitations in Kuramoto models

📅 2026-03-23
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

232K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the challenge of Bayesian inference in Kuramoto oscillator networks, where high-dimensional state spaces and intractable likelihood functions hinder conventional approaches. To overcome this, the study introduces an amortized Bayesian inference framework that leverages neural networks to learn an approximation of the posterior distribution directly from simulated phase dynamics. By bypassing repeated sampling or iterative optimization, the method substantially enhances computational efficiency and enables practical uncertainty quantification. Experiments on synthetic Kuramoto networks demonstrate that the proposed approach accurately recovers the true posterior, effectively captures parameter uncertainty, and significantly reduces computational cost. This establishes a scalable, data-driven paradigm for Bayesian inference in complex dynamical systems.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Bayesian inference is a powerful tool for parameter estimation and uncertainty quantification in dynamical systems. However, for nonlinear oscillator networks such as Kuramoto models, widely used to study synchronization phenomena in physics, biology, and engineering, inference is often computationally prohibitive due to high-dimensional state spaces and intractable likelihood functions. We present an amortized Bayesian inference approach that learns a neural approximation of the posterior from simulated phase dynamics, enabling fast, scalable inference without repeated sampling or optimization. Applied to synthetic Kuramoto networks, the method shows promising results in approximating posterior distributions and capturing uncertainty, with computational savings compared to traditional Bayesian techniques. These findings suggest that amortized inference is a practical and flexible framework for uncertainty-aware analysis of oscillator networks.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Kuramoto models
Bayesian inference
identifiability
amortized inference
oscillator networks
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

amortized inference
Kuramoto model
Bayesian inference
neural posterior approximation
synchronization
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
E
Emma Hannula
LUT University, Yliopistonkatu 34, Lappeenranta, 53850, Finland; TU Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstraße 29, Ilmenau, 98693, Germany
J
Jana de Wiljes
LUT University, Yliopistonkatu 34, Lappeenranta, 53850, Finland; TU Ilmenau, Ehrenbergstraße 29, Ilmenau, 98693, Germany
M
Matthew T. Moores
LUT University, Yliopistonkatu 34, Lappeenranta, 53850, Finland
H
Heikki Haario
LUT University, Yliopistonkatu 34, Lappeenranta, 53850, Finland
Lassi Roininen
Lassi Roininen
LUT
Inverse problems