Graph-monotone entrywise guarantees for MLE and Rank Centrality on general comparison graphs

📅 2026-10-06
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of statistical guarantees for pairwise comparison inference under irregular comparison graphs. Based on the Bradley-Terry-Luce model, it systematically analyzes the entrywise error rates of maximum likelihood estimation and the Rank Centrality algorithm over arbitrary fixed comparison graphs. The core contribution is a graph-monotone error bound based on algebraic connectivity, which relies on significantly weaker assumptions than existing results and accommodates heterogeneous sampling. Theoretically, the high-probability entrywise error rate is shown to be of order $1/\sqrt{\lambda_D}$, where $\lambda_D$ denotes the algebraic connectivity. Furthermore, the robustness of the proposed approach to adaptive enhancements is validated.
📝 Abstract
Pairwise comparisons are widely used to infer latent scores and identify top-ranked items. Although sharp statistical guarantees are available under uniform sampling, real data often induce irregular comparison graphs with heterogeneous observation counts across pairs. In this paper, we study an arbitrary fixed comparison graph under the Bradley--Terry--Luce model with minimal assumptions. We prove that both the standard maximum likelihood estimator and Rank Centrality achieve a high-probability entrywise error rate of order $1/\sqrt{λ_{\mathcal{D}}}$ up to logarithmic and dynamic-range factors, where $λ_{\mathcal{D}}$ is the algebraic connectivity of the count-weighted observation graph. This guarantee is graph-monotone since $λ_{\mathcal{D}}$ cannot decrease when additional comparisons are added. Under heterogeneous sampling, where comparison pairs are sampled independently with unequal probabilities, our guarantee improves existing error bounds or requires weaker assumptions. We further extend our analysis to show that both estimators are robust against outcome-adaptive augmentation, where an adversary can choose additional comparison pairs after observing the initial outcomes.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Pairwise comparisons
Bradley-Terry-Luce model
Maximum likelihood estimation
Rank Centrality
Comparison graphs
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Pairwise comparisons
Bradley-Terry-Luce model
Algebraic connectivity
Entrywise error guarantee
Graph-monotone
🔎 Similar Papers
2024-05-09International Conference on Information and Knowledge ManagementCitations: 1