An AI-assisted conditioning and geological interpretation workflow for usage in implicit geological modeling

📅 2026-10-07
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenges of low efficiency, significant subjective bias, and heavy reliance on manual labor in seismic interpretation for implicit geological modeling by proposing an AI-assisted interpretation toolkit that requires minimal labeled data. Methodologically, self-supervised and semi-supervised contrastive learning convolutional neural networks are employed to achieve signal enhancement, noise suppression, and data interpolation, enabling the automated extraction of horizons and faults. This workflow substantially improves both the modeling speed and reproducibility of shallow-to-deep seismic data. The successful application to the top boundary of the Maassluis Formation in the Netherlands validates the maturity and practical value of the proposed approach for real-world geological decision-making.
📝 Abstract
Implicit modeling and Relative Geologic Time are geological modeling techniques that enable more efficient, faster, less biased and more reproducible modeling results. For optimal operation, these techniques require many well-constrained input data. In the framework of the Horizon Europe GO-Forward and MOOI WarmingUP GOO projects and to accelerate Implicit modeling, Machine Learning (ML) methods have been tested and implemented in a toolkit for the interpretation of (onshore) seismic data from the shallow to deep range (+- 300 - 3500 m). The goal is to rapidly characterise this depth domain by efficient interpretation of horizons and faults in seismic data. The first step is to improve the signal by applying AI techniques like self-supervised and semi-supervised contrastive learning CNN's for noise reduction and interpolation. Next, horizons and faults are interpreted with minimal use of human-generated training data by using (semi-) self-supervised methods. The resulting developed toolkit supports the application of the implemented algorithms in an efficient workflow. As a first demonstration, the top of the Dutch Maassluis Formation has been interpreted in the Leeuwarden and Waalwijk 3D seismic cubes. Overall, this study demonstrates that AI-assisted interpretation workflows have reached a level of maturity that allows their integration into applied geological modeling and decision-making.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Implicit geological modeling
Seismic data interpretation
Horizon and fault interpretation
Machine Learning
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Implicit geological modeling
Self-supervised learning
Contrastive learning CNN
Seismic interpretation
Machine learning toolkit
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
💼 Related Jobs
No related jobs found.
S
Stefan Carpentier
TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
J
Jan Diederik van Wees
TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
E
Eva de Boever
TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
J
Jan Niederau
Fraunhofer IEG, Fraunhofer Institution for Energy Infrastructures and Geotechnologies, IEG, Aureliusstr. 2, 52062 Aachen, Germany
C
Camille Chapeland
TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
S
Suzanne Atkins
TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
Boris Boullenger
Boris Boullenger
TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
J
Jens Wollenweber
TNO Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research