🤖 AI Summary
While AI in education enhances personalized learning, it risks inheriting and amplifying data biases, exacerbating educational inequity. Existing work either prioritizes general algorithmic fairness or focuses on educational policy while neglecting technical fairness—lacking interdisciplinary integration. Method: We systematically review over 100 studies to propose the first tri-dimensional bias taxonomy—“data–algorithm–human–AI interaction”—tailored to educational contexts; develop a comprehensive fairness research framework covering assessment (e.g., demographic parity, equalized odds), intervention (pre-/in-/post-processing), and governance; and pioneer the co-optimization of fairness and predictive utility. Contribution/Results: Our framework integrates ethical evaluation, legal compliance, and cross-disciplinary governance, offering a methodological guide and implementation roadmap for trustworthy educational AI. It directly addresses core challenges—including the fairness–accuracy trade-off and scarcity of high-quality, representative educational data.
📝 Abstract
The integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) into education has transformative potential, providing tailored learning experiences and creative instructional approaches. However, the inherent biases in AI algorithms hinder this improvement by unintentionally perpetuating prejudice against specific demographics, especially in human-centered applications like education. This survey delves deeply into the developing topic of algorithmic fairness in educational contexts, providing a comprehensive evaluation of the diverse literature on fairness, bias, and ethics in AI-driven educational applications. It identifies the common forms of biases, such as data-related, algorithmic, and user-interaction, that fundamentally undermine the accomplishment of fairness in AI teaching aids. By outlining existing techniques for mitigating these biases, ranging from varied data gathering to algorithmic fairness interventions, the survey emphasizes the critical role of ethical considerations and legal frameworks in shaping a more equitable educational environment. Furthermore, it guides readers through the complexities of fairness measurements, methods, and datasets, shedding light on the way to bias reduction. Despite these gains, this survey highlights long-standing issues, such as achieving a balance between fairness and accuracy, as well as the need for diverse datasets. Overcoming these challenges and ensuring the ethical and fair use of AI's promise in education call for a collaborative, interdisciplinary approach.