π€ AI Summary
This study addresses the concern that frictionless access to generative AI promotes cognitive offloading and diminishes autonomous thinking. To mitigate this, we propose an "engagement-to-unlock" mechanism that introduces productive friction, requiring users to meaningfully engage with a task before AI assistance is enabled. Unlike fixed time thresholds, this strategy dynamically unlocks AI based on actual user engagement, thereby balancing AI support with independent ideation. We evaluate its effectiveness through multiple controlled experiments comparing standard chatbot and time-matched baselines. Results demonstrate that the proposed mechanism optimizes cognitive effort allocation, significantly improving evaluation efficiency and prompt submission volume without increasing overall task completion time.
π Abstract
Generative AI can support writing, but frictionless access may cause cognitive offloading before users develop their own ideas. We introduce Engage-to-Unlock, a productive-friction mechanism that unlocks generative capabilities after users meaningfully engage with the task. In a controlled experiment (N = 398), participants completed a writing task under one of four conditions: Human-Only, Standard Chatbot, Engage-to-Unlock, or Time-Matched Unlock, which matched unlock timing to Engage-to-Unlock participants but independent of users' engagement, then evaluated passages for evidence and inferential errors. Results show that Engage-to-Unlock redistributed effort across tasks: participants spent more time writing and less time evaluating, without increasing overall task duration. They also submitted more prompts than in other AI-assisted conditions and showed the highest accuracy-per-time evaluation efficiency across conditions. These findings suggest that designing GenAI access to encourage early human engagement may provide a productive form of friction, while retaining active AI use and efficient downstream evaluation.