Exploring Federated Learning for Thermal Urban Feature Segmentation -- A Comparison of Centralized and Decentralized Approaches

📅 2025-10-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
In urban drone thermal imaging semantic segmentation, cross-regional data cannot be centrally shared due to privacy constraints and technical limitations, exhibiting severe non-IID characteristics. Method: This work presents the first systematic evaluation of federated learning (FL) for thermal image segmentation under realistic deployment conditions. We propose a distributed training framework tailored to thermal imaging properties, integrating model aggregation optimization and communication efficiency enhancements, while comparatively analyzing client- versus server-controlled paradigms. Results: FL achieves segmentation accuracy nearly matching centralized training (mIoU degradation <3.2%) while preserving data locality. We quantitatively characterize communication overhead, training latency, and edge-device energy consumption, revealing significant performance disparities among mainstream FL algorithms under remote-sensing thermal imaging non-IID settings. This study establishes a reproducible methodology and empirical benchmark for privacy-sensitive edge-intelligent remote sensing applications.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Federated Learning (FL) is an approach for training a shared Machine Learning (ML) model with distributed training data and multiple participants. FL allows bypassing limitations of the traditional Centralized Machine Learning CL if data cannot be shared or stored centrally due to privacy or technical restrictions -- the participants train the model locally with their training data and do not need to share it among the other participants. This paper investigates the practical implementation and effectiveness of FL in a real-world scenario, specifically focusing on unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-based thermal images for common thermal feature detection in urban environments. The distributed nature of the data arises naturally and makes it suitable for FL applications, as images captured in two German cities are available. This application presents unique challenges due to non-identical distribution and feature characteristics of data captured at both locations. The study makes several key contributions by evaluating FL algorithms in real deployment scenarios rather than simulation. We compare several FL approaches with a centralized learning baseline across key performance metrics such as model accuracy, training time, communication overhead, and energy usage. This paper also explores various FL workflows, comparing client-controlled workflows and server-controlled workflows. The findings of this work serve as a valuable reference for understanding the practical application and limitations of the FL methods in segmentation tasks in UAV-based imaging.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Comparing centralized and federated learning for thermal image segmentation
Evaluating federated learning performance in real UAV deployment scenarios
Analyzing federated workflows for urban thermal feature detection
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Federated Learning trains models with distributed data
Compares centralized and decentralized learning approaches
Evaluates workflows and performance in real scenarios
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
L
Leonhard Duda
Scientific Computing Center (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
K
Khadijeh Alibabaei
Scientific Computing Center (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
E
Elena Vollmer
Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
L
Leon Klug
Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
Valentin Kozlov
Valentin Kozlov
Scientific Computing Center (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
Lisana Berberi
Lisana Berberi
Scientific Computing Center (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
M
Mishal Benz
Scientific Computing Center (SCC), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Eggenstein-Leopoldshafen, Germany
R
Rebekka Volk
Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
Juan Pedro Gutiérrez Hermosillo Muriedas
Juan Pedro Gutiérrez Hermosillo Muriedas
Scientific Computing Center, Karlsruher Institute für Technologie
Markus Götz
Markus Götz
Group leader, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Helmholtz AI
Artificial IntelligenceAI for EnergyEnergy for AILarge Scale AIDeep Learning
Judith Sáinz-Pardo Díaz
Judith Sáinz-Pardo Díaz
Researcher, Instituto de Física de Cantabria (IFCA) CSIC-UC
data sciencemachine learningprivacyfederated learningdeep learning
Á
Álvaro López García
Instituto de Física de Cantabria (IFCA), CSIC-UC, Avda. los Castros s/n, Santander, Spain
Frank Schultmann
Frank Schultmann
Institute for Industrial Production (IIP), Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
Achim Streit
Achim Streit
Director of Scientific Computing Center (SCC), Professor for Computer Science, Karlsruhe
computational science and engineeringdistributed systemsgrid computingdata management