🤖 AI Summary
This paper characterizes the preference structure of rational, attention-constrained agents facing menu choices, identifying necessary and sufficient conditions for behavioral representation via a posterior-separable cost function. Methodologically, it models preferences as a Bayesian persuasion problem and establishes equivalence between two axioms—Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Ignorance Equivalence—and the existence of a smooth posterior-separable cost function. When the cost function is prior-invariant, the axiom system implies uniform differentiability and yields a unique optimal information design strategy. The analysis leverages tools from convex analysis, particularly the hyperplane separation theorem, and joint directional differentiability. Contributions include: (i) the first rigorous equivalence result linking menu preferences to posterior-separable attention costs; (ii) a unified differentiability characterization under prior invariance; and (iii) analytical derivation of the optimal signaling policy.
📝 Abstract
We consider an agent with a rationally inattentive preference over menus of acts, as in de Oliveira et al (2017). We show that two axioms, Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives and Ignorance Equivalence, are necessary and sufficient for this agent to have a posterior-separable cost satisfying a mild smoothness condition, called joint-directional differentiability. Viewing the decision-maker's problem as a Bayesian persuasion problem, we also show that these axioms are necessary and sufficient for solvability by a unique hyperplane. When the cost function remains invariant for different priors, we show that these axioms imply uniformly posterior separable costs that are differentiable.