Ambiguity-aware Truncated Flow Matching for Ambiguous Medical Image Segmentation

๐Ÿ“… 2025-11-10
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
In ambiguous medical image segmentation (AMIS), an inherent trade-off exists between prediction accuracy and solution diversity. To address this, we propose a data-hierarchical inference paradigmโ€”first achieving effective decoupling of accuracy and diversity within truncated diffusion probabilistic models (TDPMs). Our method integrates Gaussian truncation representation, semantic-aware flow transformation, and segmentation-flow matching, thereby enhancing the reliability of truncated distributions and the plausibility of multi-solution outputs. Evaluated on LIDC and ISIC-3, our approach improves GED by 12% and HM-IoU by 7.3% over state-of-the-art methods, while reducing inference overhead. Key contributions include: (1) the first data-hierarchical inference framework for AMIS; (2) a segmentation-flow matching formulation enabling joint optimization of fidelity and diversity; and (3) empirical validation that Gaussian truncation representation excels at modeling ambiguous boundaries.

Technology Category

Application Category

๐Ÿ“ Abstract
A simultaneous enhancement of accuracy and diversity of predictions remains a challenge in ambiguous medical image segmentation (AMIS) due to the inherent trade-offs. While truncated diffusion probabilistic models (TDPMs) hold strong potential with a paradigm optimization, existing TDPMs suffer from entangled accuracy and diversity of predictions with insufficient fidelity and plausibility. To address the aforementioned challenges, we propose Ambiguity-aware Truncated Flow Matching (ATFM), which introduces a novel inference paradigm and dedicated model components. Firstly, we propose Data-Hierarchical Inference, a redefinition of AMIS-specific inference paradigm, which enhances accuracy and diversity at data-distribution and data-sample level, respectively, for an effective disentanglement. Secondly, Gaussian Truncation Representation (GTR) is introduced to enhance both fidelity of predictions and reliability of truncation distribution, by explicitly modeling it as a Gaussian distribution at $T_{ ext{trunc}}$ instead of using sampling-based approximations.Thirdly, Segmentation Flow Matching (SFM) is proposed to enhance the plausibility of diverse predictions by extending semantic-aware flow transformation in Flow Matching (FM). Comprehensive evaluations on LIDC and ISIC3 datasets demonstrate that ATFM outperforms SOTA methods and simultaneously achieves a more efficient inference. ATFM improves GED and HM-IoU by up to $12%$ and $7.3%$ compared to advanced methods.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enhancing accuracy and diversity simultaneously in ambiguous medical image segmentation
Addressing entangled prediction quality and insufficient fidelity in diffusion models
Improving plausibility of diverse predictions while maintaining efficient inference
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Data-Hierarchical Inference enhances accuracy and diversity
Gaussian Truncation Representation improves fidelity and reliability
Segmentation Flow Matching enhances plausibility of predictions
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
F
Fanding Li
Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
X
Xiangyu Li
Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
X
Xianghe Su
Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
Xingyu Qiu
Xingyu Qiu
Harbin Institute of Technology
Medical Image AnalysisGenerative AI
Suyu Dong
Suyu Dong
Postdoctoral Research Fellow, KAUST
Biomedical Image Analysis and Processing
W
Wei Wang
Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Shenzhen, China
K
Kuanquan Wang
Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
G
Gongning Luo
Faculty of Computing, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, China
S
Shuo Li
Department of Computer and Data Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio 44106, United States