🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the challenge of holistically evaluating urban traffic control policies, where direct effects—such as changes in traffic flow and emissions—are intricately intertwined with indirect effects, including behavioral responses and shifts in economic accessibility. To this end, the authors propose a multilayer urban mobility simulation framework that integrates a physical layer (modeling traffic dynamics and emissions) with a social layer (capturing user behavioral responses). The framework leverages real-world data to instantiate scenarios, encode policy parameters, and formalize behavioral assumptions, thereby enabling systematic comparison and forward-looking assessment of diverse “what-if” policy scenarios. Applied to vehicle restriction policies, the approach effectively uncovers the interactive mechanisms between policy design and user feedback, offering actionable insights for developing more anticipatory and coordinated transportation policies.
📝 Abstract
Urban traffic regulation policies are increasingly used to address congestion, emissions, and accessibility in cities, yet their impacts are difficult to assess due to the socio-technical complexity of urban mobility systems. Recent advances in data availability and computational power enable new forms of model-driven, simulation-based decision support for transportation policy design. This paper proposes a novel simulation paradigm for the ex-ante evaluation of both direct impacts (e.g., traffic conditions, modal shift, emissions) and indirect impacts spanning transportation-related effects and economic accessibility. The approach integrates a multi-layer urban mobility model combining a physical layer of mobility flows and emissions with a social layer capturing behavioral responses and adaptation to policy changes. Real-world data are used to instantiate the current as-is scenario, while policy alternatives and behavioral assumptions are encoded as model parameters to generate multiple what-if scenarios. The framework supports systematic comparison across scenarios by analyzing variations in simulated outcomes induced by policy interventions. The proposed approach is illustrated through a case study that aims to assess the impacts of the introduction of broad urban traffic restriction schemes. Results demonstrate the framework's ability to explore alternative regulatory designs and user responses, supporting informed and anticipatory evaluation of urban traffic policies.