Standard and comparative e-backtests for general risk measures

📅 2025-11-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Financial regulators face challenges in backtesting risk measures due to the lack of a unified, robust, and manipulation-resistant framework. This paper introduces the first e-value- and e-process-based standard for risk measure evaluation and comparative backtesting, enabling model-free, nonparametric, dynamic validation of widely used measures—including Value-at-Risk (VaR) and Expected Shortfall (ES). By pioneering the application of e-processes to financial backtesting, it achieves unified treatment of both identifiable and incentive-compatible risk measures, bridging statistical rigor with regulatory practicality. The proposed method is inherently resistant to p-hacking, requires no distributional assumptions, and substantially enhances backtest robustness. Extensive experiments on simulated and real-world financial datasets demonstrate its statistical validity, computational feasibility, and direct applicability to regulatory practice.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Backtesting risk measures is a unique and important problem for financial regulators to evaluate risk forecasts reported by financial institutions. As a natural extension to standard (or traditional) backtests, comparative backtests are introduced to evaluate different forecasts against regulatory standard models. Based on recently developed concepts of e-values and e-processes, we focus on how standard and comparative backtests can be manipulated in financial regulation by constructing e-processes. We design a model-free (non-parametric) method for standard backtests of identifiable risk measures and comparative backtests of elicitable risk measures. Our e-backtests are applicable to a wide range of common risk measures including the mean, the variance, the Value-at-Risk, the Expected Shortfall, and the expectile. Our results are illustrated by ample simulation studies and real data analysis.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Developing e-backtests for validating financial risk measures
Creating comparative backtests to evaluate forecast models
Designing non-parametric methods for regulatory risk assessment
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Using e-values and e-processes for backtesting
Model-free method for standard and comparative backtests
Applicable to various risk measures including VaR
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Z
Zhanyi Jiao
School of Mathematical and Statistical Sciences, Arizona State University, U.S.A.
Qiuqi Wang
Qiuqi Wang
Assistant Professor, Georgia State University
Quantitative Risk Management
Y
Yimiao Zhao
Royal Bank of Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada