Identification and Robust Inference for Multiple Treatment Effects with Possibly Invalid Instruments

📅 2026-07-23
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses causal effect identification in observational settings with unmeasured confounding and potentially invalid instrumental variables, focusing on linear instrumental variable models with multiple endogenous treatments. The authors propose generalized majority and plurality rules to achieve identification, coupled with a data-driven instrument selection procedure that yields sampling confidence intervals robust to the erroneous inclusion of invalid instruments. Under standard regularity conditions, these intervals are shown to attain asymptotic nominal coverage and exhibit length shrinking at the parametric rate. The practical utility and validity of the proposed method are demonstrated through an empirical application in Mendelian randomization.
📝 Abstract
The instrumental variable (IV) method is widely used to infer causal effects in observational studies with unmeasured confounding, but invalid instruments can compromise both population identification and finite-sample inference. This paper studies linear IV models with multiple endogenous treatments and possibly invalid instruments. Identification is more delicate than in the single-treatment setting because a single instrument no longer identifies a scalar candidate effect; instead, each relevant instrument defines a hyperplane in the multidimensional effect space. For identification of multiple treatment effects, we introduce generalized plurality and majority rules which require a sufficiently large number of IVs to be valid. For inference, data-dependent instrument selection may fail to separate certain invalid IVs from valid ones, leading to undercoverage of confidence intervals when these invalid instruments are mistakenly selected as valid. We propose a sampling confidence interval for each treatment effect, which is robust to IV selection errors. We establish asymptotic coverage and parametric-rate length of our sampling confidence interval under regularity conditions and illustrate this method in a Mendelian randomization application.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

instrumental variables
multiple treatments
invalid instruments
causal inference
robust inference
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

multiple treatment effects
invalid instruments
generalized plurality rule
robust inference
sampling confidence interval
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.