A Survey on Knowledge-Oriented Retrieval-Augmented Generation

📅 2025-03-11
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

159K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses core challenges in retrieval-augmented generation (RAG): inefficient knowledge integration, misalignment between retrieval and generation, weak interpretability, and poor domain adaptability. To this end, it proposes a knowledge-oriented unified RAG methodology encompassing retrieval mechanisms, generative modeling, and collaborative paradigms, and introduces— for the first time—a three-dimensional evaluation framework centered on knowledge utilization efficacy: dynamic knowledge alignment, interpretability, and domain adaptability. The approach integrates information retrieval, LLM fine-tuning, multimodal fusion, and neuro-symbolic reasoning, with empirical validation on benchmarks including RECALL and KILT. It systematically characterizes RAG’s performance boundaries and accuracy-efficiency trade-offs across question answering, summarization, and information retrieval tasks. Finally, it identifies six key frontiers: lightweight retrieval, trustworthy knowledge injection, and others.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has gained significant attention in recent years for its potential to enhance natural language understanding and generation by combining large-scale retrieval systems with generative models. RAG leverages external knowledge sources, such as documents, databases, or structured data, to improve model performance and generate more accurate and contextually relevant outputs. This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of RAG by examining its fundamental components, including retrieval mechanisms, generation processes, and the integration between the two. We discuss the key characteristics of RAG, such as its ability to augment generative models with dynamic external knowledge, and the challenges associated with aligning retrieved information with generative objectives. We also present a taxonomy that categorizes RAG methods, ranging from basic retrieval-augmented approaches to more advanced models incorporating multi-modal data and reasoning capabilities. Additionally, we review the evaluation benchmarks and datasets commonly used to assess RAG systems, along with a detailed exploration of its applications in fields such as question answering, summarization, and information retrieval. Finally, we highlight emerging research directions and opportunities for improving RAG systems, such as enhanced retrieval efficiency, model interpretability, and domain-specific adaptations. This paper concludes by outlining the prospects for RAG in addressing real-world challenges and its potential to drive further advancements in natural language processing.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enhance natural language understanding and generation using external knowledge.
Integrate retrieval mechanisms with generative models for accurate outputs.
Address challenges in aligning retrieved information with generative objectives.
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Combines retrieval systems with generative models
Uses external knowledge to enhance outputs
Categorizes methods from basic to advanced
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Mingyue Cheng
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
Y
Yucong Luo
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
O
Ouyang Jie
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
Q
Qi Liu
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
H
Huijie Liu
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
L
Li Li
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
S
Shuo Yu
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
B
Bohou Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
J
Jiawei Cao
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
J
Jie Ma
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China
D
Daoyu Wang
State Key Laboratory of Cognitive Intelligence, University of Science and Technology of China, China