π€ AI Summary
In challenging environments, ground-penetrating radar (GPR)-based robot localization suffers from low displacement estimation accuracy due to subtle variations in consecutive B-scan images. To address this, we propose a deep neural network that jointly models multi-scale feature differences and similarities. Our method introduces, for the first time, a multi-scale feature contrast mechanism: a custom network extracts hierarchical representations from sequential B-scan images, and both dissimilarity and similarity cues are fused to regress Euclidean displacement distances. Evaluated on the CMU-GPR dataset, our approach achieves a weighted RMSE of 0.449 mβimproving upon the current state-of-the-art by 10.2%. It significantly enhances robustness and accuracy for fine-grained displacements, particularly under adverse conditions. This work establishes a new paradigm for all-weather, GPR-based localization.
π Abstract
When performing robot/vehicle localization using ground penetrating radar (GPR) to handle adverse weather and environmental conditions, existing techniques often struggle to accurately estimate distances when processing B-scan images with minor distinctions. This study introduces a new neural network-based odometry method that leverages the similarity and difference features of GPR B-scan images for precise estimation of the Euclidean distances traveled between the B-scan images. The new custom neural network extracts multi-scale features from B-scan images taken at consecutive moments and then determines the Euclidean distance traveled by analyzing the similarities and differences between these features. To evaluate our method, an ablation study and comparison experiments have been conducted using the publicly available CMU-GPR dataset. The experimental results show that our method consistently outperforms state-of-the-art counterparts in all tests. Specifically, our method achieves a root mean square error (RMSE), and achieves an overall weighted RMSE of 0.449 m across all data sets, which is a 10.2% reduction in RMSE when compared to the best state-of-the-art method.