🤖 AI Summary
This study systematically investigates the impact of large language models (LLMs) on scientific production patterns, paper quality, and scholarly evaluation. Leveraging a dataset comprising 2.1 million preprints, 28,000 peer-review reports, and 246 million citation accesses, and integrating scientometric analysis, natural language processing, and citation behavior modeling, the research reveals— for the first time—that LLM usage inverts the traditional positive correlation between linguistic complexity and paper quality. Findings indicate that authors using LLMs produce 23.7%–89.3% more papers, with increased linguistic sophistication but limited substantive contribution. Moreover, LLM-assisted authors significantly broaden their citation scope, preferentially citing more diverse, cutting-edge, yet lower-cited works, thereby reshaping the academic citation ecosystem.
📝 Abstract
With the production process rapidly evolving, science policy must consider how institutions could evolve.