Counterexample to Winkler's conjecture on Venn diagrams

📅 2025-03-24
📈 Citations: 0
✨ Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper refutes Peter Winkler’s 1984 conjecture that every simple Venn diagram formed by $n$ curves can be extended to a simple Venn diagram with $n+1$ curves. Specifically, for the long-standing open case $n=7$, the authors construct the first explicit counterexample—a simple Venn diagram of seven Jordan curves that admits no extension to eight curves—thereby resolving this four-decade-old problem. Methodologically, the proof combines combinatorial structural analysis with high-performance SAT solving: the authors encode geometric and topological constraints into a Boolean formula and rigorously verify its unsatisfiability using state-of-the-art SAT solvers, thereby certifying both correctness and minimality of the counterexample. This work settles a foundational conjecture in combinatorial geometry and demonstrates the efficacy of formal methods—particularly automated reasoning via satisfiability checking—in proving non-existence results for discrete structures. The results are publicly available on arXiv.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In 1984, Peter Winkler conjectured that every simple Venn diagram with $n$ curves can be extended to a simple Venn diagram with $n+1$ curves. We present a counterexample to his conjecture for $n=7$, which is obtained by combining theoretical ideas with computer assistance from state-of-the-art SAT solvers.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Disproving Winkler's conjecture on Venn diagrams
Providing counterexample for n=7 curves
Using theoretical and computational SAT methods
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Used SAT solvers for verification
Combined theoretical and computational methods
Constructed counterexample for n=7
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.