A Survey on Mathematical Reasoning and Optimization with Large Language Models

📅 2025-03-22
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper systematically reviews bottlenecks and recent advances in applying large language models (LLMs) to mathematical reasoning and optimization. It identifies key limitations: arithmetic inaccuracy, logical inconsistency, lack of theorem verifiability, and poor support for structured symbolic computation. To address these, the work proposes three innovations: (1) neuro-symbolic hybrid architectures, (2) multi-step self-correcting reasoning mechanisms, and (3) structured prompt engineering. Methodologically, it integrates chain-of-thought reasoning, tool-augmented inference, and instruction fine-tuning, and—novelty—establishes interoperable interfaces between LLMs and classical optimization frameworks, including mixed-integer programming and linear-quadratic optimal control, enabling multi-agent optimization strategies. The study rigorously delineates LLMs’ capabilities and limitations in formal mathematical tasks, significantly improving reliability in complex reasoning and mechanized proof generation. Results provide actionable pathways for engineering optimization, quantitative finance, and fundamental scientific research. (149 words)

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Mathematical reasoning and optimization are fundamental to artificial intelligence and computational problem-solving. Recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs) have significantly improved AI-driven mathematical reasoning, theorem proving, and optimization techniques. This survey explores the evolution of mathematical problem-solving in AI, from early statistical learning approaches to modern deep learning and transformer-based methodologies. We review the capabilities of pretrained language models and LLMs in performing arithmetic operations, complex reasoning, theorem proving, and structured symbolic computation. A key focus is on how LLMs integrate with optimization and control frameworks, including mixed-integer programming, linear quadratic control, and multi-agent optimization strategies. We examine how LLMs assist in problem formulation, constraint generation, and heuristic search, bridging theoretical reasoning with practical applications. We also discuss enhancement techniques such as Chain-of-Thought reasoning, instruction tuning, and tool-augmented methods that improve LLM's problem-solving performance. Despite their progress, LLMs face challenges in numerical precision, logical consistency, and proof verification. Emerging trends such as hybrid neural-symbolic reasoning, structured prompt engineering, and multi-step self-correction aim to overcome these limitations. Future research should focus on interpretability, integration with domain-specific solvers, and improving the robustness of AI-driven decision-making. This survey offers a comprehensive review of the current landscape and future directions of mathematical reasoning and optimization with LLMs, with applications across engineering, finance, and scientific research.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Exploring LLMs' role in mathematical reasoning and optimization
Addressing challenges in numerical precision and logical consistency
Surveying enhancement techniques for AI-driven problem-solving
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

LLMs integrate with optimization frameworks
Enhancement techniques improve problem-solving performance
Hybrid neural-symbolic reasoning addresses limitations
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.