Optimizing Generative AI's Accuracy and Transparency in Inductive Thematic Analysis: A Human-AI Comparison

📅 2025-03-08
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This paper addresses the low accuracy and lack of transparency in generative AI–driven thematic analysis. To tackle these issues, we propose a reproducible AI-assisted coding framework. Methodologically, it integrates the GPT-4 Turbo API, structured stepwise prompt engineering, and Python-based automation to implement a systematic coding pipeline that preserves verbatim quotations and precise page-level citations. Our contributions are threefold: (1) First demonstration of AI coding inter-rater reliability matching human-level agreement; (2) Thematic classification accuracy statistically equivalent to expert human coders; and (3) Superior thematic interpretation—producing more abstract, conceptual, and contextually grounded explanations than human analysts. Collectively, the framework significantly enhances verification, traceability, and reproducibility, establishing a methodological paradigm for AI-augmented qualitative coding in social science research.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
This study highlights the transparency and accuracy of GenAI's inductive thematic analysis, particularly using GPT-4 Turbo API integrated within a stepwise prompt-based Python script. This approach ensured a traceable and systematic coding process, generating codes with supporting statements and page references, which enhanced validation and reproducibility. The results indicate that GenAI performs inductive coding in a manner closely resembling human coders, effectively categorizing themes at a level like the average human coder. However, in interpretation, GenAI extends beyond human coders by situating themes within a broader conceptual context, providing a more generalized and abstract perspective.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Evaluating GenAI's accuracy in inductive thematic analysis
Ensuring transparency in AI-driven coding processes
Comparing human and AI thematic interpretation capabilities
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

GPT-4 Turbo API for thematic analysis
Stepwise prompt-based Python script
Traceable systematic coding process
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Matthew Nyaaba
Matthew Nyaaba
Ph.D. Candidate in Teacher Education and Elementary Education (University of Georgia, US)
Generative AITeacher EducationCulturally Responsive AssessmentsSTEM Education
M
Min SungEun
Department of Elementary, Middle Level, Library and Technologies Education, Kutztown University, Kutztown, PA, USA.
M
Mary Abiswin Apam
Midwifery Department, College of Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Sciences, Nalerigu, Ghana.
K
K. O. Acheampong
Department of Lifelong Education, Administration, and Policy, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA
E
Emmanuel Dwamena
Department of Curriculum and Instruction, University of Connecticut, USA