🤖 AI Summary
This paper investigates how learning speed affects long-run equilibrium selection in inertia-coordinated games. How does the Bayesian learning rate—specifically, the order of posterior precision growth—determine whether players converge to the risk-dominant action, and whether rapid learning induces shock propagation and multiplicity of equilibrium paths? Method: Integrating Bayesian learning, dynamic game theory, and asymptotic equilibrium analysis, the study treats learning speed as a critical threshold variable, unifying static global games within a micro-founded learning framework. Contribution/Results: We rigorously establish that sub-quadratic growth of posterior precision (slow learning) ensures the risk-dominant action is the unique long-run equilibrium; in contrast, super-quadratic growth (fast learning) triggers self-fulfilling spirals and shock diffusion, leading to equilibrium multiplicity. This reveals a novel mechanism whereby learning dynamics are endogenously coupled with state evolution, fundamentally altering equilibrium outcomes.
📝 Abstract
We analyze inertial coordination games: dynamic coordination games with an endogenously changing state that depends on (i) a persistent fundamental players privately learn about over time; and (ii) past play. The speed of learning determines long-run equilibrium dynamics: the risk-dominant action is played in the limit if and only if learning is slow such that posterior precisions grow sub-quadratically. This generalizes results from static global games and endows them with a learning foundation. Conversely, when learning is fast such that posterior precisions grow super-quadratically, shocks can propagate and generate self-fulfilling spirals.