A semantic approach to mapping the Provenance Ontology to Basic Formal Ontology

📅 2024-08-02
🏛️ Scientific Data
📈 Citations: 1
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the semantic fragmentation and poor interoperability between PROV-O (Provenance Ontology) and BFO (Basic Formal Ontology). We propose a semantics- and logic-driven ontology mapping methodology that formally specifies alignment criteria, supports consistency checking via OWL reasoning and SPARQL-based validation, and adheres strictly to FAIR principles in ontology engineering. Our approach yields the first verifiable, formal alignment set bridging PROV-O and BFO. Empirical evaluation on canonical PROV-O instances confirms both logical consistency and semantic fidelity of the alignment. The resulting mappings significantly enhance the interpretability and interoperability of provenance data within the BFO top-level framework, enabling principled cross-domain provenance knowledge integration. This contribution provides both a reusable methodological foundation and foundational infrastructure for ontology-based provenance interoperability.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
The Provenance Ontology (PROV-O) is a World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) recommended ontology used to structure data about provenance across a wide variety of domains. Basic Formal Ontology (BFO) is a top-level ontology ISO/IEC standard used to structure a wide variety of ontologies, such as the OBO Foundry ontologies and the Common Core Ontologies (CCO). To enhance interoperability between these two ontologies, their extensions, and data organized by them, a mapping methodology and set of alignments are presented according to specific criteria which prioritize semantic and logical principles. The ontology alignments are evaluated by checking their logical consistency with canonical examples of PROV-O instances and querying terms that do not satisfy the alignment criteria as formalized in SPARQL. A variety of semantic web technologies are used in support of FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, Reusable) principles.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Mapping Provenance Ontology to Basic Formal Ontology
Enhancing interoperability between PROV-O and BFO
Evaluating alignments using semantic and logical principles
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Mapping PROV-O to BFO using semantic principles
Evaluating alignments with PROV-O instances and SPARQL
Leveraging semantic web tech for FAIR compliance
T
Tim Prudhomme
National Center for Ontological Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Conceptual Systems, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
G
Giacomo De Colle
National Center for Ontological Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
A
Austin Liebers
National Center for Ontological Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Philosophy, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
A
Alec Sculley
National Center for Ontological Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Summit Knowledge Solutions, Arlington, VA, USA
P
P. Xie
National Center for Ontological Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA; Department of Philosophy, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
S
Sydney Cohen
National Center for Ontological Research, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
John Beverley
John Beverley
Assistant Professor, University at Buffalo
LogicApplied OntologyResponsibility