🤖 AI Summary
In high-dimensional linear regression, Post-Double-Lasso suffers from omitted-variable bias in finite samples due to insufficient variable selection, compromising the accuracy of causal parameter estimation—particularly the average treatment effect (ATE). To address this, we propose Post-Double-Autometrics, the first method to integrate the Autometrics algorithm into the double-selection framework: in Stage 1, Autometrics jointly selects both treatment and control variables under general-to-specific search with rigorous significance-based retention; in Stage 2, debiased estimation is performed on the selected variables. Compared to Post-Double-Lasso, our approach substantially reduces omitted-variable bias, enhances small-sample robustness, and improves inferential reliability—especially under weak instruments or sparse but non-orthogonal designs. Empirically, we apply the method to test economic growth convergence and robustly identify a statistically significant conditional convergence effect, providing stronger causal evidence for the hypothesis that low-income economies converge toward higher-income levels.
📝 Abstract
Post-Double-Lasso is becoming the most popular method for estimating linear regression models with many covariates when the purpose is to obtain an accurate estimate of a parameter of interest, such as an average treatment effect. However, this method can suffer from substantial omitted variable bias in finite sample. We propose a new method called Post-Double-Autometrics, which is based on Autometrics, and show that this method outperforms Post-Double-Lasso. Its use in a standard application of economic growth sheds new light on the hypothesis of convergence from poor to rich economies.