🤖 AI Summary
Quantifying cognitive recovery delay after reasoning inconsistency in multi-agent systems (MAS) remains an open challenge. Method: We propose MTTR-A (Mean Time to Cognitive Recovery), a novel cognitive-domain reliability metric, systematically extending classical reliability concepts (e.g., MTTR, MTBF) to distributed reasoning recovery. Using the AG-News corpus and LangGraph framework, we construct a reflection-pattern simulation benchmark to compare automated reflection versus human-in-the-loop approval in recovery dynamics. Contribution/Results: Automated reflection achieves stable recovery within 6 seconds on average; MTTR-A is 6.21±2.14 s (median), MTBF is 6.7±2.14 s, and normalized recovery rate (NRR) reaches 0.08. This work establishes a measurable, comparable, and reproducible evaluation paradigm for cognitive recovery—providing both theoretical foundations and empirical benchmarks for MAS resilience modeling.
📝 Abstract
Ensuring cognitive stability in autonomous multi-agent systems (MAS) is a central challenge for large-scale, distributed AI. While existing observability tools monitor system outputs, they cannot quantify how rapidly agentic workflows recover once reasoning coherence has been lost. We adapt classical reliability metrics-Mean Time-to-Recovery (MTTR), Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF), and related ratios-into the cognitive domain, defining MTTR-A (Mean Time-to-Recovery for Agentic Systems) as a runtime measure of cognitive recovery latency. MTTR-A quantifies the time required for a MAS to detect reasoning drift and restore consistent operation, capturing the recovery of reasoning coherence rather than infrastructural repair. A benchmark simulation using the AG~News corpus and the LangGraph orchestration framework was conducted, modeling recovery latencies across multiple reflex modes. Automated reflexes restored stability within approximately 6s on average, while human-approval interventions required about 12s. Across 200 runs, the median simulated MTTR-A was 6.21+-2.14s, MTBF=6.7+-2.14s, and NRR=0.08, demonstrating measurable runtime resilience across reflex strategies. By formalizing recovery latency as a quantifiable property of distributed reasoning-and deriving reliability bounds linking recovery time and cognitive uptime-this work establishes a foundation for runtime dependability in agentic cognition, transforming cognitive recovery from an ad-hoc process into a standardized, interpretable performance