Lean Formalization of Generalization Error Bound by Rademacher Complexity

📅 2025-03-25
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the formal verification of generalization error bounds in machine learning. Methodologically, it constructs, for the first time in Lean 4, an end-to-end verifiable theoretical framework based on Rademacher complexity: it formally defines empirical and population Rademacher complexities, proves the symmetrization lemma, and integrates McDiarmid’s inequality, Hoeffding’s lemma, and a verified probability inequality library to rigorously derive upper bounds on generalization error. In contrast to classical PAC and VC-dimension frameworks—which impose restrictive assumptions on hypothesis classes—this approach directly supports modern learning models, including deep neural networks and kernel methods. All definitions, lemmas, and theorems are type-checked in Lean 4, yielding the first fully formalized, mechanically verified, and reusable foundation for Rademacher-based generalization theory.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
We formalize the generalization error bound using Rademacher complexity in the Lean 4 theorem prover. Generalization error quantifies the gap between a learning machine's performance on given training data versus unseen test data, and Rademacher complexity serves as an estimate of this error based on the complexity of learning machines, or hypothesis class. Unlike traditional methods such as PAC learning and VC dimension, Rademacher complexity is applicable across diverse machine learning scenarios including deep learning and kernel methods. We formalize key concepts and theorems, including the empirical and population Rademacher complexities, and establish generalization error bounds through formal proofs of McDiarmid's inequality, Hoeffding's lemma, and symmetrization arguments.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Formalize generalization error bound using Rademacher complexity
Quantify performance gap between training and test data
Establish bounds via McDiarmid's inequality and symmetrization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Formalizing Rademacher complexity in Lean 4
Proving generalization bounds via McDiarmid's inequality
Applying Rademacher complexity to diverse ML scenarios
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
Sho Sonoda
Sho Sonoda
RIKEN Center for Advanced Intelligence Project (AIP)
machine learningharmonic analysis
K
Kazumi Kasaura
OMRON SINIC X Corporation
Y
Yuma Mizuno
University College Dublin
K
Kei Tsukamoto
The University of Tokyo
N
Naoto Onda
University College Dublin