🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses the lack of a systematic framework to guide experimental design decisions in replication studies. It proposes the first multidimensional design space framework specifically tailored for replication research, conceptualizing replication as a pairwise comparison problem. The framework structures replication planning and analysis through four practical dimensions—task, data, method, and metrics—and three comparative levels: micro, meso, and macro. By offering actionable design guidelines and a comprehensive taxonomy, it enables both prospective planning and retrospective evaluation of replication efforts. Empirical case studies in visualization and human-computer interaction demonstrate the framework’s effectiveness in enhancing the rigor of replication designs and improving the comparability of evaluation outcomes.
📝 Abstract
The importance of replication is often discussed and advocated -- not only in the domains of visualization and HCI, but in all scientific areas. When replicating a study, design decisions need to be made with regards which aspects of the original study will remain the same and which will be altered. We present a supporting multi-dimensional design space framework within which such decisions can be identified, categorized, compared and analyzed. The framework treats replication experimental design as a pairwise comparison problem, and represents the design by four practical dimensions defined by three comparison levels. The design space is therefore a framework that can be used for both retrospective characterization and prospective planning. We provide worked examples, and relate our framework to other attempts at describing the scope of replication studies.