π€ AI Summary
This study addresses the problem of deterministic finite-time gathering of memoryless autonomous robots in the Euclidean plane under adversarial visibility faults, where up to $K$ robotsβ views may be maliciously obstructed. Within the distributed Look-Compute-Move framework, the work proposes two novel algorithms: the first achieves gathering under the fully synchronous (FSYNC) model for the previously open case of $(4,2)$ visibility faults without requiring additional capabilities or global coordinate agreement; the second extends to the more general asynchronous (ASYNC) model, supporting arbitrary $(N,K)$ fault scenarios. Leveraging a non-rigid movement model and a mild assumption of partial axis orientation consistency, both algorithms employ robust observation-computation-movement strategies that guarantee deterministic finite-time gathering under their respective scheduling models.
π Abstract
This paper studies the gathering problem for a set of $N \ge 2$ autonomous mobile robots operating in the Euclidean plane under the distributed Look-Compute-Move model. We consider oblivious robots executing under the adversarial defected view model, in which an activated robot may observe only a restricted subset of robots due to adversarial visibility faults. Consequently, the information obtained during each Look phase may be incomplete and dynamically altered. The objective is to guarantee deterministic finite-time gathering at a location not known a priori despite such sensing restrictions. We present two distributed algorithms under distinct scheduling assumptions. In the fully synchronous (FSYNC) model, we prove finite-time gathering in the adversarial (4, 2) defected view setting, resolving a previously open case without requiring additional capabilities or coordinate agreement. In the asynchronous (ASYNC) model, we establish finite-time gathering under the general adversarial (N, K) defected view model, where an activated robot observes at most K of the other $N - 1$ robots for any $1 \le K<N - 1$. Both results hold under non-rigid motion. The proposed algorithm for the ASYNC model assumes agreement in the direction and orientation of one coordinate axis.