🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the lack of coherence in longitudinal analyses of scientific knowledge graphs, which often stems from inconsistent approaches to topic identification and cross-temporal linkage. To overcome this limitation, the authors propose a unified relational framework that integrates cross-sectional topic detection and longitudinal lineage reconstruction within a single weighted network structure. For the first time, topic evolution is modeled as structural reconfiguration rather than lexical continuity within a relational paradigm. By incorporating relational clustering, directional coverage, centrality-weighted measures of lineage strength, and document membership modeling, the method substantially enhances methodological consistency and interpretive robustness in longitudinal science mapping. This approach enables a more accurate and nuanced understanding of the dynamic mechanisms underlying scientific topic evolution.
📝 Abstract
Strategic diagrams and co-word analysis are widely employed to examine the conceptual structure of scientific domains and their development over time. Yet a structural inconsistency characterises dominant longitudinal implementations: themes are detected through relational clustering in weighted networks, whereas their inter-temporal connections are commonly inferred from set-theoretic overlap among keywords or core documents. This study introduces a structurally integrated framework in which lineage reconstruction is embedded within the same weighted relational architecture that underpins cross-sectional detection. The approach models thematic continuity through graded document affiliation and a lineage-strength measure that combines directional coverage with centrality-weighted structural relevance, thereby conceptualising evolution as the reconfiguration of relational structures rather than simple lexical persistence. By aligning thematic detection and temporal modelling within a unified relational paradigm, the framework enhances the methodological coherence and interpretive robustness of longitudinal science mapping.