Towards a fully differentiable digital twin for solar cells

📅 2025-12-02
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF
🤖 AI Summary
Existing solar cell simulations are typically isolated modules, hindering end-to-end gradient-based joint optimization of annual energy yield (EY). To address this, we propose Sol(Di)²T—the first fully differentiable digital twin framework for photovoltaics—that unifies material properties, morphological parameters, optical/electrical physics-based simulations, and spatiotemporal climate-geographic conditions, enabling gradient-driven co-optimization across multiple scales. Leveraging differentiable programming, Sol(Di)²T tightly couples first-principles physical models with differentiable machine learning surrogate models, establishing an end-to-end differentiable pipeline from atomic-scale material descriptors to system-level EY prediction. Validated on organic photovoltaics, Sol(Di)²T achieves high-fidelity EY prediction under unseen operating conditions and identifies globally optimal device configurations. This represents a significant advance over conventional non-differentiable, fragmented simulation paradigms, enabling physics-informed, scalable, and differentiable photovoltaic design optimization.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Maximizing energy yield (EY) - the total electric energy generated by a solar cell within a year at a specific location - is crucial in photovoltaics (PV), especially for emerging technologies. Computational methods provide the necessary insights and guidance for future research. However, existing simulations typically focus on only isolated aspects of solar cells. This lack of consistency highlights the need for a framework unifying all computational levels, from material to cell properties, for accurate prediction and optimization of EY prediction. To address this challenge, a differentiable digital twin, Sol(Di)$^2$T, is introduced to enable comprehensive end-to-end optimization of solar cells. The workflow starts with material properties and morphological processing parameters, followed by optical and electrical simulations. Finally, climatic conditions and geographic location are incorporated to predict the EY. Each step is either intrinsically differentiable or replaced with a machine-learned surrogate model, enabling not only accurate EY prediction but also gradient-based optimization with respect to input parameters. Consequently, Sol(Di)$^2$T extends EY predictions to previously unexplored conditions. Demonstrated for an organic solar cell, the proposed framework marks a significant step towards tailoring solar cells for specific applications while ensuring maximal performance.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Develops a differentiable digital twin for solar cells
Unifies material to cell properties for energy yield prediction
Enables gradient-based optimization of solar cell performance
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Differentiable digital twin for end-to-end solar cell optimization
Machine-learned surrogate models enable gradient-based parameter optimization
Unified framework integrates material properties to climatic conditions
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.
M
Marie Louise Schubert
Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
Houssam Metni
Houssam Metni
Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
J
J. D. Fischbach
Institute of Theoretical Informatics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
B
Benedikt Zerulla
Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
M
Marjan Krsti'c
Institute of Theoretical Solid State Physics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
U
U. Paetzold
Institute of Microstructure Technology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
S
Seyedamir Orooji
Light Technology Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
O
Olivier J J Ronsin
Helmholtz-Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Erlangen, Germany
Y
Yasin Ameslon
Helmholtz-Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Erlangen, Germany
Jens Harting
Jens Harting
Helmholtz-Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Erlangen, Germany
T
Thomas Kirchartz
IMD-3 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ), Jülich, Germany
S
Sandheep Ravishankar
IMD-3 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ), Jülich, Germany
C
Chris Dreessen
IMD-3 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ), Jülich, Germany
E
Eunchi Kim
IMD-3 Photovoltaik, Forschungszentrum Jülich (FZJ), Jülich, Germany
C
Christian Sprau
Light Technology Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
M
Mohamed Hussein
Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt
A
A. Colsmann
Light Technology Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany
K
Karen Forberich
Helmholtz-Institute Erlangen-Nürnberg for Renewable Energy (IET-2), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Erlangen, Germany
K
Klaus Jager
Department Optics for Solar Energy (SE-AOPT), Helmholtz-Zentrum Berlin für Materialien und Energie GmbH, Berlin, Germany
Pascal Friederich
Pascal Friederich
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology
Machine LearningMaterials designGraph Neural NetworksComputational chemistryMultiscale modeling
Carsten Rockstuhl
Carsten Rockstuhl
Institute of Nanotechnology, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, Germany