Informative missingness and its implications in semi-supervised learning

📅 2025-12-03
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

208K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work addresses semi-supervised classification under informative label missingness—where the missingness mechanism depends on features or class labels. To overcome the limitation of conventional semi-supervised learning (SSL) methods, which ignore information embedded in the missingness mechanism, we propose a likelihood-based framework grounded in finite mixture models that explicitly models the label missingness process and jointly optimizes labeled and unlabeled data via the EM algorithm. Theoretical analysis shows that, under informative missingness, our approach achieves lower asymptotic expected error than supervised learning using only fully labeled data. Empirical results demonstrate substantial accuracy gains in settings with moderate class overlap and sparse labeling. To our knowledge, this is the first work to systematically reveal and exploit the statistical information carried by the missingness indicator within a unified likelihood inference framework, thereby bridging statistical missing-data modeling and semi-supervised learning.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
Semi-supervised learning (SSL) constructs classifiers using both labelled and unlabelled data. It leverages information from labelled samples, whose acquisition is often costly or labour-intensive, together with unlabelled data to enhance prediction performance. This defines an incomplete-data problem, which statistically can be formulated within the likelihood framework for finite mixture models that can be fitted using the expectation-maximisation (EM) algorithm. Ideally, one would prefer a completely labelled sample, as one would anticipate that a labelled observation provides more information than an unlabelled one. However, when the mechanism governing label absence depends on the observed features or the class labels or both, the missingness indicators themselves contain useful information. In certain situations, the information gained from modelling the missing-label mechanism can even outweigh the loss due to missing labels, yielding a classifier with a smaller expected error than one based on a completely labelled sample analysed. This improvement arises particularly when class overlap is moderate, labelled data are sparse, and the missingness is informative. Modelling such informative missingness thus offers a coherent statistical framework that unifies likelihood-based inference with the behaviour of empirical SSL methods.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Addresses informative missingness in semi-supervised learning classification
Examines when missing labels provide more information than complete labels
Unifies likelihood-based inference with empirical SSL methods behavior
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

Modeling informative missingness in SSL
Using EM algorithm for likelihood framework
Incorporating missing-label mechanism information
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.