The Architecture of Errors: From Universal Impossibility to Patch-Local LLM Reliability

📅 2026-05-28
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

212K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This work establishes that large language models cannot achieve universal reliability across all tasks due to the infinitely diverse failure modes they encounter, which cannot be fully mitigated by any finite set of interventions. For the first time, it formally proves the impossibility of全域 (universal) reliability and advocates shifting focus to locally tractable “patch domains”—such as legal review or medical question-answering—where error modes are sparse and enumerable. By constructing a taxonomy of failure modes, an intervention dictionary, and an active mode exposure model, the theory demonstrates that the required intervention budget grows only polylogarithmically with sequence length and asymptotically approaches a constant once the catalog of failure modes saturates. Empirical results confirm that this approach substantially reduces residual error rates within bounded task domains, offering both a theoretical foundation and a practical pathway toward high-reliability deployment.
📝 Abstract
Universal LLM reliability is not a finite-library problem: across all possible tasks, tools, schemas, knowledge sources, and evaluator expectations, new intervention-distinguishable failure modes can appear without bound, so no finite intervention dictionary can guarantee bounded residual error for every such mode. But deployed systems do not operate over the whole universe. They operate inside operationally bounded patches (legal review, medical RAG, code repair, customer-support agents, contract extraction) with recurring tasks, schemas, tools, and evaluator expectations. Within such patches, empirical evidence suggests failures are sparse, repetitive, and concentrated in a small recurring catalogue, so reliability becomes a local catalogue-discovery and intervention-coverage problem rather than an exponential token-length problem. We formalize this transition with two propositions and one corollary. Proposition 1 is the worst-case-mode-wise negative result: no finite intervention dictionary covers every distinguishable failure mode of an unbounded domain. Corollary 1 is the inverse-discovery implication: the logarithmic upper bound on mode discovery cannot accommodate linearly more distinct tail modes without exponentially more observed hard-failure events. Proposition 2 is the positive patch-local result: under log active-mode exposure and head-heavy coverage, a sufficient per-hard-decision intervention budget grows polylogarithmically in sequence length and becomes domain-constant once the patch catalogue saturates. The framework relocates rather than dissolves long-context difficulty: where the number of hard decisions itself grows with task length, reliability remains hard; the contribution is to identify the on-axis intervention rather than to make those regimes easy.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

LLM reliability
failure modes
operationally bounded patches
intervention coverage
error catalog
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

patch-local reliability
failure mode catalog
intervention coverage
LLM reliability
bounded operational domain