Joint Affine Spectral Shaping: Coupling Weight and Bias Updates Beyond Weight-Only Muon

๐Ÿ“… 2026-08-03
๐Ÿ“ˆ Citations: 0
โœจ Influential: 0
๐Ÿ“„ PDF
๐Ÿค– AI Summary
This work addresses a key limitation in conventional spectral optimization methods for neural networks, which decouple weight and bias updates despite their intrinsic coupling within affine transformations, often leading to suboptimal solutions. To overcome this, the authors propose a joint spectral allocation mechanism that unifies weights and biases into a momentum matrix and synchronously generates their updates via truncated regularized inverse spectral mapping, enabling joint spectral shaping. This approach preserves the norm of weight updates while drastically compressing bias update normsโ€”by nearly 90%โ€”and steers the movement direction of decision boundaries. Evaluated on from-scratch training of BERT-mini, the SVD-based joint update strategy achieves an IMDb test accuracy of 85.74% ยฑ 0.20%, outperforming baselines across all five random seeds, reduces validation loss to 0.3291, and significantly enhances model performance consistency.
๐Ÿ“ Abstract
Matrix spectral optimizers reshape weight-update spectra but usually delegate vector-valued biases to a separate optimizer. We study whether this separation is neutral. We formulate each affine layer as a joint momentum matrix $A=[M_W,ฮฑm_b]$ and apply a capped regularized-inverse spectral map to the complete matrix, producing both the weight and physical bias updates. A strict five-seed ablation on a four-layer BERT-mini trained from scratch on IMDb compares exact-SVD Muon, weight-only inverse shaping, affine-probe inverse shaping, and the proposed joint regularized inverse (JRI). Weight-only inverse shaping raises validation-loss-selected test accuracy from $84.903\pm0.242\%$ to $85.562\pm0.308\%$ and lowers selected test loss from $0.3479$ to $0.3345$. Allowing bias to alter the joint SVD while retaining an independent Adam bias update does not improve over weight-only inverse shaping. Using the transformed bias jointly raises selected test accuracy to $85.738\pm0.180\%$ and lowers test loss to $0.3291$, with all five seeds improving relative to the probe baseline. During the peak-performance window, JRI preserves the eligible weight-update norm while reducing the bias-update norm from $0.02095$ to $0.00301$, lowers boundary-function share from $86.58\%$ to $78.97\%$, and changes the cosine between weight-induced boundary motion and explicit bias from $+0.030$ to $-0.137$. An independent 22-seed replication yields $85.743\pm0.203\%$ selected test accuracy. These results identify joint affine spectral allocation as a small but consistent extension to weight-only spectral optimization.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

spectral optimization
affine layer
weight-bias coupling
matrix shaping
deep learning optimization
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

joint spectral shaping
affine layer optimization
regularized inverse spectrum
bias-weight coupling
momentum matrix SVD
๐Ÿ”Ž Similar Papers
No similar papers found.