LLM Serving in the Wild: An Empirical Study of Frameworks, Methods, and System Designs

2026-08-03

AI Summary

This study addresses the lack of systematic empirical investigation into the deployment of large language model (LLM) inference frameworks in real-world software systems. Through large-scale analysis of open-source projects, combining static code analysis with metadata mining, this work systematically characterizes the adoption patterns and integration strategies of prominent frameworks—including vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, LMDeploy, and FlashInfer—and examines their relationships with model type, scale, modality, and deployment environment. The findings reveal that vLLM exhibits the highest adoption rate, while multi-framework co-deployment remains limited yet holds complementary potential. Framework selection is strongly driven by model characteristics and application scenarios, effectively supporting diverse system designs such as reinforcement learning inference, multimodal generation, and microservice architectures.

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) are integrated into software systems and AI services, making efficient LLM serving a concern for software engineering. Serving LLMs is challenging because inference requires computation, memory, GPU resources, and execution while maintaining latency and throughput. Although prior research has proposed LLM inference, optimization, and serving techniques and frameworks, little is known about how they are adopted in practice. In this study, we investigate the use of LLM serving frameworks and serving methods in open-source software systems. We identify and analyze five LLM-specific frameworks: vLLM, SGLang, TensorRT-LLM, LMDeploy, and FlashInfer. We examine how these frameworks and techniques are adopted individually and in combination, how adoption varies across categories of LLMs, and how repositories differ in intent, focus, use case, and architectural design. Our results show that vLLM is the most visible framework in popularity and adoption, while parallel computation, memory management, and network pruning are the most frequently used serving-method categories. Multi-framework usage is limited, suggesting that developers rely on a single serving framework; however, combined frameworks connect complementary capabilities across the serving stack. Framework adoption varies across model families, modalities, model sizes, domain specializations, and deployment settings. Repository-level analysis shows that LLM serving frameworks support applications and architectures, including Reinforcement Learning (RL)-based reasoning, multimodal generation and understanding, microservices, and cloud infrastructure. Overall, this study provides a large-scale empirical characterization of LLM serving framework adoption in practice and offers insights for researchers, framework maintainers, and practitioners working on LLM systems.

Problem

• LLM serving
• framework adoption
• empirical study
• open-source software
• system design

Innovation

• LLM serving
• empirical study
• serving frameworks
• system design
• open-source analysis