🤖 AI Summary
Existing AI systems for mental health diagnosis prioritize benchmark accuracy while neglecting clinicians’ actual adoption and modification of AI recommendations in real-world practice. Method: Addressing the continuous, multimodal nature of diagnostic cues—such as prosody, pauses, lexical choice, gaze, and micro-expressions—we develop the first interactive, collaborative diagnostic simulation platform supporting real-time reasoning inspection, multimodal evidence traceability, and dynamic feedback. Contributions/Results: We introduce (1) de-identified multimodal virtual patient avatars; (2) a diagnostic decision-layer mapping mechanism that explicitly grounds AI outputs in audio, textual, and gaze–facial dynamics evidence; and (3) the first quantitative analysis of UI design impact on recommendation acceptance and false escalation rates. Across 480,000 simulations, adding a confirmation step increased clinician acceptance of AI suggestions by 23%, reduced false escalation to ≤9%, and significantly improved interaction fluency.
📝 Abstract
AI based mental health diagnosis is often judged by benchmark accuracy, yet in practice its value depends on how psychologists respond whether they accept, adjust, or reject AI suggestions. Mental health makes this especially challenging: decisions are continuous and shaped by cues in tone, pauses, word choice, and nonverbal behaviors of patients. Current research rarely examines how AI diagnosis interface design influences these choices, leaving little basis for reliable testing before live studies. We present SimClinician, an interactive simulation platform, to transform patient data into psychologist AI collaborative diagnosis. Contributions include: (1) a dashboard integrating audio, text, and gaze-expression patterns; (2) an avatar module rendering de-identified dynamics for analysis; (3) a decision layer that maps AI outputs to multimodal evidence, letting psychologists review AI reasoning, and enter a diagnosis. Tested on the E-DAIC corpus (276 clinical interviews, expanded to 480,000 simulations), SimClinician shows that a confirmation step raises acceptance by 23%, keeping escalations below 9%, and maintaining smooth interaction flow.