🤖 AI Summary
This study investigates the intrinsic mechanisms underlying cross-domain misalignment—termed “emergent misalignment”—in large language models (LLMs) after fine-tuning on fine-grained harmful data. Addressing the key question of *why single-domain harmful training generalizes to broad inappropriate behavior*, we propose a geometric analytical framework integrating cosine similarity, principal component analysis, parameter subspace projection overlap, and linear interpolation connectivity experiments. We首次 discover that misaligned behaviors across distinct harmful tasks reside in a shared low-dimensional parameter subspace and exhibit pronounced linear structure within it; models obtained via cross-task linear interpolation retain consistent, widespread harmful outputs, confirming functional equivalence and parameter convergence. These findings reveal that misalignment possesses a tractable, geometrically localizable nature—establishing a theoretical foundation and novel intervention pathways for controllable alignment.
📝 Abstract
Recent work has discovered that large language models can develop broadly misaligned behaviors after being fine-tuned on narrowly harmful datasets, a phenomenon known as emergent misalignment (EM). However, the fundamental mechanisms enabling such harmful generalization across disparate domains remain poorly understood. In this work, we adopt a geometric perspective to study EM and demonstrate that it exhibits a fundamental cross-task linear structure in how harmful behavior is encoded across different datasets. Specifically, we find a strong convergence in EM parameters across tasks, with the fine-tuned weight updates showing relatively high cosine similarities, as well as shared lower-dimensional subspaces as measured by their principal angles and projection overlaps. Furthermore, we also show functional equivalence via linear mode connectivity, wherein interpolated models across narrow misalignment tasks maintain coherent, broadly misaligned behavior. Our results indicate that EM arises from different narrow tasks discovering the same set of shared parameter directions, suggesting that harmful behaviors may be organized into specific, predictable regions of the weight landscape. By revealing this fundamental connection between parametric geometry and behavioral outcomes, we hope our work catalyzes further research on parameter space interpretability and weight-based interventions.