🤖 AI Summary
Existing AI ethics research lacks systematic attention to content risks posed by large language models (LLMs) in child-centric contexts—such as home, school, and peer interactions.
Method: Drawing on real-world cases of LLM chatbot misuse by middle-school students, we propose the first content risk taxonomy specifically for minors and introduce MinorBench: the first open-source, manually annotated, interpretable, and multidimensional benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs’ ability to detect and refuse unsafe or inappropriate queries directed at children.
Contribution/Results: Empirical evaluation across six mainstream LLMs reveals substantial variation in refusal rates (32%–91%), demonstrating MinorBench’s validity and discriminative power. This work fills a critical gap in child-focused AI safety assessment and provides both empirical grounding and practical tooling for developing child-friendly safety mechanisms.
📝 Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) are rapidly entering children's lives - through parent-driven adoption, schools, and peer networks - yet current AI ethics and safety research do not adequately address content-related risks specific to minors. In this paper, we highlight these gaps with a real-world case study of an LLM-based chatbot deployed in a middle school setting, revealing how students used and sometimes misused the system. Building on these findings, we propose a new taxonomy of content-based risks for minors and introduce MinorBench, an open-source benchmark designed to evaluate LLMs on their ability to refuse unsafe or inappropriate queries from children. We evaluate six prominent LLMs under different system prompts, demonstrating substantial variability in their child-safety compliance. Our results inform practical steps for more robust, child-focused safety mechanisms and underscore the urgency of tailoring AI systems to safeguard young users.