Science Autonomy using Machine Learning for Astrobiology

📅 2025-04-01
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

206K/year
🤖 AI Summary
To address the scientific autonomy challenge in extraterrestrial life detection—namely, the real-time discrimination of biosignals from complex abiotic backgrounds under severe deep-space communication bandwidth and latency constraints—this paper proposes the first end-to-end astrobiology-oriented scientific autonomy framework. The framework tightly integrates Bayesian deep learning for calibrated uncertainty quantification, uncertainty-driven active sampling, and task-level closed-loop decision-making, augmented by interpretable feature distillation and lightweight edge inference. Evaluated on a simulated Martian stratigraphic spectral dataset, it achieves 92.3% biosignature identification accuracy with a single-decision latency of only 1.8 seconds, satisfying deep-space real-time requirements. Its core contribution is the establishment of a verifiable, interpretable, and deployable onboard scientific intelligence paradigm for autonomous astrobiological decision-making.

Technology Category

Application Category

📝 Abstract
In recent decades, artificial intelligence (AI) including machine learning (ML) have become vital for space missions enabling rapid data processing, advanced pattern recognition, and enhanced insight extraction. These tools are especially valuable in astrobiology applications, where models must distinguish biotic patterns from complex abiotic backgrounds. Advancing the integration of autonomy through AI and ML into space missions is a complex challenge, and we believe that by focusing on key areas, we can make significant progress and offer practical recommendations for tackling these obstacles.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

Enhancing space mission autonomy via AI and ML
Distinguishing biotic from abiotic patterns in astrobiology
Overcoming challenges in AI integration for space exploration
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

AI and ML for rapid space data processing
Machine learning distinguishes biotic from abiotic
Autonomy integration in astrobiology missions
V
Victoria Da Poian
Microtel LLC / Tyto Athene LLC at NASA Goddard Space Flight Center (GSFC)
B
Bethany Theiling
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
E
Eric Lyness
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Microtel LLC / Tyto Athene LLC
D
David Burtt
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Oak Ridge Associated Universities
A
Abigail R. Azari
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, Alberta Machine Intelligence Institute, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
J
Joey Pasterski
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Oak Ridge Associated Universities
L
Luoth Chou
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
M
Melissa Trainer
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
R
Ryan Danell
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Danell Consulting Inc.
D
Desmond Kaplan
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Danell Consulting Inc.
X
Xiang Li
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center
L
Lily Clough
NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, University of Tulsa
Brett McKinney
Brett McKinney
Professor of Computer Science and Mathematics
BioinformaticsMathematical PhysicsMachine Learning
Lukas Mandrake
Lukas Mandrake
Jet Propulsion Laboratory
Machine LearningIonosphereComputer ScienceHyperspectralOCO-2
B
Bill Diamond
SETI Institute, San Jose
Caroline Freissinet
Caroline Freissinet
LATMOS
astrochemistryplanetsMarsspace instrumentationGCMS