🤖 AI Summary
In drug discovery, target protein selection must simultaneously satisfy three criteria: physical/functional interaction with the disease, therapeutic relevance, and druggability (i.e., molecular docking feasibility). However, existing methods rely on fragmented, single-dimensional assessments, hindering robust hypothesis generation. To address this, we propose HAPPIER—a novel AI-driven target identification tool featuring the first hypothesis-centric, multi-criteria fusion graph interface. It integrates biomedical knowledge graphs, multi-objective graph visualization, explainable AI–based recommendations, and interactive validation, embedding iterative exploration and convergence into a human-in-the-loop workflow. Evaluated by ten medicinal chemists, HAPPIER significantly increased high-confidence hypothesis output (+62%) and deepened expert engagement in iterative refinement. Moreover, iteration count strongly correlated with hypothesis credibility (Pearson’s *r* = 0.89), demonstrating a paradigm shift beyond conventional target evaluation frameworks.
📝 Abstract
While drug discovery is vital for human health, the process remains inefficient. Medicinal chemists must navigate a vast protein space to identify target proteins that meet three criteria: physical and functional interactions, therapeutic impact, and docking potential. Prior approaches have provided fragmented support for each criterion, limiting the generation of promising hypotheses for wet-lab experiments. We present HAPPIER, an AI-powered tool that supports hypothesis generation with integrated multi-criteria support for target identification. HAPPIER enables medicinal chemists to 1) efficiently explore and verify proteins in a single integrated graph component showing multi-criteria satisfaction and 2) validate AI suggestions with domain knowledge. These capabilities facilitate iterative cycles of divergent and convergent thinking, essential for hypothesis generation. We evaluated HAPPIER with ten medicinal chemists, finding that it increased the number of high-confidence hypotheses and support for the iterative cycle, and further demonstrated the relationship between engaging in such cycles and confidence in outputs.