The Structural Influence of Low-Credibility Narratives During the COVID-19 Vaccine Rollout

📅 2026-05-31
📈 Citations: 0
Influential: 0
📄 PDF

career value

182K/year
🤖 AI Summary
This study addresses the structural influence of low-credibility narratives on social media and examines the divergent roles of automated accounts and human users across distinct phases of the pandemic. Drawing on a dataset of 5.8 million vaccine-related posts from X (formerly Twitter), the work introduces two novel metrics—Appeal and Scope—to jointly capture the weighted popularity of low-credibility content and the network penetration capacity of its authors, thereby integrating perspectives from both information diffusion and network topology. Analyzing three temporal phases—pre-vaccine, vaccine rollout, and post-rollout—the findings reveal that human users exert greater overall structural influence, peaking during the week of vaccine introduction, whereas automated accounts exhibit their strongest impact in the pre-rollout phase, when uncertainty was highest.
📝 Abstract
This work examines the structural influence of low-credibility narratives and the comparative role of automated accounts (bots) versus human users on social media platforms. To more accurately quantify the structural influence of a narrative on social media, this study proposes two novel metrics: (1) Appeal, which measures the network-weighted popularity of a message; and (2) Scope, which measures an author's message popularity-weighted network penetration. Applying these metrics, this study analyzes 5.8 million messages from X that contain low-credibility narratives regarding COVID-19 vaccine across three distinct temporal stages: Pre-Vaccine, Vaccine Launch, and Post-Launch. The results demonstrate that across all timeframes, human-distributed low-credibility narratives achieved higher structural influence compared to those generated by automated accounts. Furthermore, statistical analysis reveals a significant conditional temporal effect: human-driven low-credibility narratives attained their highest Appeal and Scope during the focal Vaccine Launch week, whereas automated accounts maximized their Appeal and Scope during the highly uncertain Pre-Vaccine period. These findings highlight the distinct operational capacities of automated and organic accounts, illustrating how the Appeal and Scope of low-credibility narratives is moderated by the lifecycle stages of critical public events.
Problem

Research questions and friction points this paper is trying to address.

low-credibility narratives
structural influence
social media
automated accounts
COVID-19 vaccine
Innovation

Methods, ideas, or system contributions that make the work stand out.

structural influence
Appeal
Scope
low-credibility narratives
automated accounts
🔎 Similar Papers
No similar papers found.